# Latent-space metrics for Complex-Valued VAE out-of-distribution detection under radar clutter

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19805 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19805/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03888/) (2018)
- [An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02691/) (2019)
- [Deep Complex Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.09792/) (2017)
- [Anomaly detection through latent space restoration using vector-quantized variational autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06765/) (2020)
- [On Out-of-Distribution Detection for Audio with Deep Nearest Neighbors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15283/) (2022)
- [Out-of-Distribution Radar Detection in Compound Clutter and Thermal Noise through Variational Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04861/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate complex-valued Variational AutoEncoders (CVAE) for radar Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) detection in complex radar environments. We proposed several detection metrics: the reconstruction error of CVAE (CVAE-MSE), the latent-based scores (Mahalanobis, Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD)), and compared their performance against the classical ANMF-Tyler detector (ANMF-FP). The performance of all these detectors is analyzed on synthetic and experimental radar data, showing the advantages and the weaknesses of each detector.
