# SPQR: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Safety Alignment under Benign Model Adaptation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19558 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19558/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 37 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/robustness-privacy-and-adversarial-aspects/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/safety-alignment-and-jailbreak-attacks/)
- LLM safety and security / [Vision-language and text-to-image safety](https://mlsanity.com/safety/vision-language-and-text-to-image-safety/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04249/) (2024)
- [Qwen-Image Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02324/) (2025)
- [BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.04657/) (2023)
- [Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13188/) (2023)
- [Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07345/) (2023)
- [Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05105/) (2022)
- [Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14761/) (2023)
- [SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12508/) (2023)
- [MACE: Mass Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06135/) (2024)
- [Forget-Me-Not: Learning to Forget in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17591/) (2023)
- [Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10012/) (2023)
- [Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20086/) (2023)
- [SneakyPrompt: Jailbreaking Text-to-image Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12082/) (2023)
- [Unsafe Diffusion: On the Generation of Unsafe Images and Hateful Memes From Text-To-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13873/) (2023)
- [One-Dimensional Adapter to Rule Them All: Concepts, Diffusion Models and Erasing Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16145/) (2023)
- [Defensive Unlearning with Adversarial Training for Robust Concept Erasure in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15234/) (2024)
- [Can Machines Help Us Answering Question 16 in Datasheets, and In Turn Reflecting on Inappropriate Content?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06675/) (2022)
- [Reliable and Efficient Concept Erasure of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12383/) (2024)
- [Jailbreaking Prompt Attack: A Controllable Adversarial Attack against Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02928/) (2024)
- [Latent Guard: a Safety Framework for Text-to-image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08031/) (2024)
- [Erasing Undesirable Influence in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05779/) (2024)
- [UnsafeBench: Benchmarking Image Safety Classifiers on Real-World and AI-Generated Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03486/) (2024)
- [Scissorhands: Scrub Data Influence via Connection Sensitivity in Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06187/) (2024)
- [LlavaGuard: An Open VLM-based Framework for Safeguarding Vision Datasets and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05113/) (2024)
- [UnlearnCanvas: Stylized Image Dataset for Enhanced Machine Unlearning Evaluation in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11846/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Projected Gradient Unlearning for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models: Defending Against Concept Revival Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21041/) (2026)
- [A Gravitational Interpretation of Safety Reversion under Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.28525/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image diffusion models can emit copyrighted, unsafe, or private content. Safety alignment aims to suppress specific concepts, yet evaluations seldom test whether safety persists under benign downstream fine-tuning routinely applied after deployment (e.g., LoRA personalization, style/domain adapters). We study the stability of current safety methods under benign fine-tuning and observe frequent breakdowns. As true safety alignment must withstand even benign post-deployment adaptations, we introduce the SPQR benchmark (Safety, Prompt adherence, Quality, and Robustness). SPQR is a single-scored metric that provides a unified, reproducible framework to evaluate how well safety-aligned diffusion models preserve safety, utility, and robustness under benign fine-tuning, by reporting a single leaderboard score to facilitate comparisons. We conduct multilingual, domain-specific, and out-of-distribution analyses, along with category-wise breakdowns, to identify when safety alignment fails after benign fine-tuning, ultimately showcasing SPQR as a concise yet comprehensive benchmark for T2I safety alignment techniques for T2I models.