# Evaluating Dataset Watermarking for Fine-tuning Traceability of Customized Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Removal Approach

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19316 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19316/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/robustness-privacy-and-adversarial-aspects/)
- LLM safety and security / [Watermarking generated content and models](https://mlsanity.com/safety/watermarking-generated-content-and-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.7766/) (2014)
- [DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12242/) (2022)
- [An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01618/) (2022)
- [SwinIR: Image Restoration Using Swin Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10257/) (2021)
- [Multi-Concept Customization of Text-to-Image Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04488/) (2022)
- [Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09011/) (2020)
- [Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12396/) (2022)
- [Variational image compression with a scale hyperprior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01436/) (2018)
- [Learned Image Compression with Discretized Gaussian Mixture Likelihoods and Attention Modules](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.01568/) (2020)
- [HiDDeN: Hiding Data With Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.09937/) (2018)
- [SVDiff: Compact Parameter Space for Diffusion Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11305/) (2023)
- [The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15435/) (2023)
- [Cold Diffusion: Inverting Arbitrary Image Transforms Without Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09392/) (2022)
- [StegaStamp: Invisible Hyperlinks in Physical Photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.05343/) (2019)
- [Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08457/) (2020)
- [A Recipe for Watermarking Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10137/) (2023)
- [Are Diffusion Models Vulnerable to Membership Inference Attacks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01316/) (2023)
- [Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01953/) (2023)
- [FreeCustom: Tuning-Free Customized Image Generation for Multi-Concept Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.13870/) (2024)
- [DiffusionShield: A Watermark for Copyright Protection against Generative Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.04642/) (2023)
- [Generative Watermarking Against Unauthorized Subject-Driven Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07754/) (2023)
- [Watermark-embedded Adversarial Examples for Copyright Protection against Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09401/) (2024)
- [Invisible Steganography via Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.08571/) (2018)
- [FT-Shield: A Watermark Against Unauthorized Fine-tuning in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02401/) (2023)
- [Towards Reliable Verification of Unauthorized Data Usage in Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10437/) (2024)
- [CDI: Copyrighted Data Identification in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12858/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Adversarial Attacks for Good: A Survey of Proactive Protection across the Visual Content Lifecycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04314/) (2026)
- [Trustworthy synthetic visual media: Evidence across the media lifecycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34232/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent fine-tuning techniques for diffusion models enable them to reproduce specific image sets, such as particular faces or artistic styles, but also introduce copyright and security risks. Dataset watermarking has been proposed to ensure traceability by embedding imperceptible watermarks into training images, which remain detectable in outputs even after fine-tuning. However, current methods lack a unified evaluation framework. To address this, this paper establishes a general threat model and introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework encompassing Universality, Transmissibility, and Robustness. Experiments show that existing methods perform well in universality and transmissibility, and exhibit some robustness against common image processing operations, yet still fall short under real-world threat scenarios. To reveal these vulnerabilities, the paper further proposes a practical watermark removal method that fully eliminates dataset watermarks without affecting fine-tuning, highlighting a key challenge for future research.