# C3Po: Cross-View Cross-Modality Correspondence by Pointmap Prediction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18559 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18559/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12039/) (2020)
- [DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14132/) (2023)
- [SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11763/) (2019)
- [Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06158/) (2017)
- [SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Description](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.07629/) (2017)
- [FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.06852/) (2015)
- [LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00680/) (2021)
- [Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3R](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09756/) (2024)
- [FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01925/) (2016)
- [Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.10654/) (2018)
- [Emergent Correspondence from Image Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03881/) (2023)
- [Joint 2D-3D-Semantic Data for Indoor Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.01105/) (2017)
- [RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15404/) (2023)
- [Structured3D: A Large Photo-realistic Dataset for Structured 3D Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.00222/) (2019)
- [VIGOR: Cross-View Image Geo-localization beyond One-to-one Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12172/) (2020)
- [PlaNet - Photo Geolocation with Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05314/) (2016)
- [Building Generalizable Agents with a Realistic and Rich 3D Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.02209/) (2018)
- [OrienterNet: Visual Localization in 2D Public Maps with Neural Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02009/) (2023)
- [MegaScenes: Scene-Level View Synthesis at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11819/) (2024)
- [Plan2Scene: Converting Floorplans to 3D Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05375/) (2021)
- [MSD: A Benchmark Dataset for Floor Plan Generation of Building Complexes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10121/) (2024)
- [Visual and Object Geo-localization: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.15202/) (2021)
- [WAFFLE: Multimodal Floorplan Understanding in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00955/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Multi-Way Representation Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06205/) (2026)
- [SceneAligner: 3D-Grounded Floorplan Localization in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22581/) (2026)
- [Z-FLoc: Zero-Shot Floorplan Localization via Geometric Primitives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.04788/) (2026)
- [AutoCompass: Accurate Visual Localization on Public Maps by Learning from Weak Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02798/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Geometric models like DUSt3R have shown great advances in understanding the geometry of a scene from pairs of photos. However, they fail when the inputs are from vastly different viewpoints (e.g., aerial vs. ground) or modalities (e.g., photos vs. abstract drawings) compared to what was observed during training. This paper addresses a challenging version of this problem: predicting correspondences between ground-level photos and floor plans. Current datasets for joint photo-floor plan reasoning are limited, either lacking in varying modalities (VIGOR) or lacking in correspondences (WAFFLE). To address these limitations, we introduce a new dataset, C3, created by first reconstructing a number of scenes in 3D from Internet photo collections via structure-from-motion, then manually registering the reconstructions to floor plans gathered from the Internet, from which we can derive correspondences between images and floor plans. C3 contains 90K paired floor plans and photos across 597 scenes with 153M pixel-level correspondences and 85K camera poses. We find that state-of-the-art correspondence models struggle on this task. By training on our new data, we can improve on the best performing method by 34% in RMSE. We also use the predicted correspondences to estimate camera poses and evaluate performance using recall metrics. Lastly, we identify open challenges in cross-modal geometric reasoning that our dataset aims to help address.
