# Jacobian-Aware Posterior Sampling for Inverse Problems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18471 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18471/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Inverse problems and image restoration, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Inverse problems and image restoration](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/inverse-problems-and-image-restoration/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05600/) (2019)
- [RePaint: Inpainting using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.09865/) (2022)
- [Diffusion Posterior Sampling for General Noisy Inverse Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14687/) (2022)
- [Denoising Diffusion Restoration Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11793/) (2022)
- [The Perception-Distortion Tradeoff](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.06077/) (2017)
- [Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Denoising Diffusion Null-Space Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00490/) (2022)
- [Solving Inverse Problems in Medical Imaging with Score-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.08005/) (2021)
- [Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems using Manifold Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00941/) (2022)
- [Learning Deep CNN Denoiser Prior for Image Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03264/) (2017)
- [Denoising Diffusion Models for Plug-and-Play Image Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08995/) (2023)
- [The Little Engine that Could: Regularization by Denoising (RED)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.02862/) (2016)
- ["Zero-Shot" Super-Resolution using Deep Internal Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.06087/) (2017)
- [A Variational Perspective on Solving Inverse Problems with Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04391/) (2023)
- [Solving Inverse Problems with Latent Diffusion Models via Hard Data Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08123/) (2023)
- [Improving Diffusion Inverse Problem Solving with Decoupled Noise Annealing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01521/) (2024)
- [Solving Linear Inverse Problems Provably via Posterior Sampling with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00619/) (2023)
- [Guidance with Spherical Gaussian Constraint for Conditional Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03201/) (2024)
- [Estimating High Order Gradients of the Data Distribution by Denoising](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04726/) (2021)
- [Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems Using Optimal Posterior Covariance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02149/) (2024)
- [Image Restoration by Denoising Diffusion Models with Iteratively Preconditioned Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16519/) (2023)
- [Correction Filter for Single Image Super-Resolution: Robustifying Off-the-Shelf Deep Super-Resolvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00157/) (2019)
- [ADIR: Adaptive Diffusion for Image Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03221/) (2022)
- [Zero-Shot Image Restoration Using Few-Step Guidance of Consistency Models (and Beyond)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20596/) (2024)
- [Super-Resolution via Image-Adapted Denoising CNNs: Incorporating External and Internal Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12866/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion models provide powerful generative priors for solving inverse problems by sampling from a posterior distribution conditioned on corrupted measurements. Existing methods primarily follow two paradigms: direct methods, which approximate the likelihood term, and proximal methods, which incorporate intermediate solutions satisfying measurement constraints into the sampling process. Under standard Gaussian approximations and locally-linear measurements, we demonstrate that these approaches differ fundamentally in their treatment of the diffusion denoiser's Jacobian within the likelihood term. While this Jacobian encodes critical prior knowledge of the data distribution, training-induced non-idealities can degrade performance in zero-shot settings. In this work, we bridge direct and proximal approaches by proposing a principled Jacobian-Aware Posterior Sampler (JAPS). JAPS leverages the Jacobian's prior knowledge while mitigating its detrimental effects through a corresponding proximal solution, requiring no additional computational cost. Additionally, we integrate our guidance into DDIM sampling, with a corrected conditional factor that has been missing in previous works. Our method enhances reconstruction quality across diverse linear and nonlinear noisy imaging tasks, outperforming existing diffusion-based baselines in perceptual quality while maintaining or improving distortion metrics.