# IndustryNav: Exploring Spatial Reasoning of Embodied Agents in Dynamic Industrial Navigation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17384 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17384/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 47 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 47)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01201/) (2019)
- [Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.07280/) (2017)
- [Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16860/) (2024)
- [ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01734/) (2019)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14171/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their Habitat](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14405/) (2021)
- [Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.10654/) (2018)
- [Depth Pro: Sharp Monocular Metric Depth in Less Than a Second](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02073/) (2024)
- [Visual Language Maps for Robot Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05714/) (2022)
- [ScanQA: 3D Question Answering for Spatial Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10482/) (2021)
- [Embodied Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11543/) (2017)
- [REVERIE: Remote Embodied Visual Referring Expression in Real Indoor Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.10151/) (2019)
- [3D-VLA: A 3D Vision-Language-Action Generative World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09631/) (2024)
- [SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01584/) (2024)
- [NavGPT: Explicit Reasoning in Vision-and-Language Navigation with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16986/) (2023)
- [Hierarchical Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphs for Language-Grounded Robot Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17846/) (2024)
- [Neural Topological SLAM for Visual Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12256/) (2020)
- [SpatialBot: Precise Spatial Understanding with Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13642/) (2024)
- [3DSRBench: A Comprehensive 3D Spatial Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07825/) (2024)
- [Towards Learning a Generalist Model for Embodied Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02010/) (2023)
- [RoboSpatial: Teaching Spatial Understanding to 2D and 3D Vision-Language Models for Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16537/) (2024)
- [L3MVN: Leveraging Large Language Models for Visual Target Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05501/) (2023)
- [SG-Nav: Online 3D Scene Graph Prompting for LLM-based Zero-shot Object Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08189/) (2024)
- [NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 2: An Accurate and Efficient Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Reasoning Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14444/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [SATURN: Symbolic Spatial Reasoning for Multi-Perspective Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22694/) (2026)
- [UrbanGround: From Local Perception to Spatial Agency in a Real-Scale City](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.27456/) (2026)
- [IndustryAssetEQA: A Neurosymbolic Operational Intelligence System for Embodied Question Answering in Industrial Asset Maintenance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23446/) (2026)
- [CLAMP: Constrained Decoding for Vision-Language Embodied Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.08602/) (2026)
- [EgoPathBench: Evaluating Zero-Shot Egocentric Waypoint Decision-Making in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16610/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs) show great promise as embodied agents, they continue to face substantial challenges in spatial reasoning. Existing embodied benchmarks largely focus on passive, static household environments and evaluate isolated capabilities, failing to capture holistic performance in interactive and dynamic complexity of specific domains. To fill this gap, we present IndustryNav, the first dynamic industrial navigation benchmark for active spatial reasoning. IndustryNav leverages 12 manually created, high-fidelity Unity warehouse scenarios featuring dynamic objects and human movement. We proposes a zero-shot PointGoal navigation pipeline that effectively combines egocentric vision with global odometry to assess holistic local-global planning. Furthermore, we introduce the "collision rate" and "warning rate" metrics to measure safety-oriented behaviors. A comprehensive study of fourteen state-of-the-art VLLMs (including models such as GPT-5.2, Claude-4.6, and Gemini-3) reveals that closed-source models maintain a consistent advantage; however, all agents exhibit notable deficiencies in robust path planning, collision avoidance and active exploration. This highlights a critical need for embodied research to move beyond passive perception and toward tasks that demand stable planning, active exploration, and safe behavior in vivid, dynamic environments.