# Vision Language Models are Confused Tourists

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17004 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17004/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12261/) (2019)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16241/) (2020)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14586/) (2021)
- [Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15412/) (2024)
- [Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06581/) (2024)
- [CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05967/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Vision Language Models for Cultural Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10920/) (2024)
- [Vision Language Models are Biased](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23941/) (2025)
- [All Languages Matter: Evaluating LMMs on Culturally Diverse 100 Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16508/) (2024)
- [SEACrowd: A Multilingual Multimodal Data Hub and Benchmark Suite for Southeast Asian Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10118/) (2024)
- [CultureVLM: Characterizing and Improving Cultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models for over 100 Countries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01282/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Morphological Compositional Generalization in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12656/) (2024)
- [CLAIM: Mitigating Multilingual Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models with Cross-Lingual Attention Intervention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11073/) (2025)
- [Seeing Culture: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning and Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16517/) (2025)
- [CultiVerse: Towards Cross-Cultural Understanding for Paintings with Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00435/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Compositional Generalisation in VLMs and Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.20783/) (2025)
- [Do VLMs Have Bad Eyes? Diagnosing Compositional Failures via Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16652/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Sci-Rho: A Multilingual Visually-Grounded Symbolic Benchmark for STEM Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08034/) (2026)
- [Cultural Moment Benchmark: Evaluating Video Cultural Reasoning and Grounding in Southeast Asia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23065/) (2026)
- [In-Context Learning Can Help Vision-Language Models Overcome Training Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.12942/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Although the cultural dimension has been one of the key aspects in evaluating Vision-Language Models (VLMs), their ability to remain stable across diverse cultural inputs remains largely untested, despite being crucial to support diversity and multicultural societies. Existing evaluations often rely on benchmarks featuring only a singular cultural concept per image, overlooking scenarios where multiple, potentially unrelated cultural cues coexist. To address this gap, we introduce ConfusedTourist, a novel cultural adversarial robustness suite designed to assess VLMs' stability against perturbed geographical cues. Our experiments reveal a critical vulnerability, where accuracy drops heavily under simple image-stacking perturbations and even worsens with its image-generation-based variant. Interpretability analyses further show that these failures stem from systematic attention shifts toward distracting cues, diverting the model from its intended focus. These findings highlight a critical challenge: visual cultural concept mixing can substantially impair even state-of-the-art VLMs, underscoring the urgent need for more culturally robust multimodal understanding.