# The Impact of Prosodic Segmentation on Speech Synthesis of Spontaneous Speech

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14779 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14779/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [FastSpeech 2: Fast and High-Quality End-to-End Text to Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04558/) (2020)
- [WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audio](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00747/) (2023)
- [Emilia: An Extensive, Multilingual, and Diverse Speech Dataset for Large-Scale Speech Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05361/) (2024)
- [XTTS: a Massively Multilingual Zero-Shot Text-to-Speech Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04904/) (2024)
- [Guided-TTS: A Diffusion Model for Text-to-Speech via Classifier Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.11755/) (2021)
- [Koel-TTS: Enhancing LLM based Speech Generation with Preference Alignment and Classifier Free Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05236/) (2025)
- [CML-TTS A Multilingual Dataset for Speech Synthesis in Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10097/) (2023)
- [Spontaneous Style Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Controllable Spontaneous Behaviors Based on Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13509/) (2024)
- [Automatic Prosody Annotation with Pre-Trained Text-Speech Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07956/) (2022)
- [Multi-Modal Automatic Prosody Annotation with Contrastive Pretraining of SSWP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05423/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spontaneous speech presents several challenges for speech synthesis, particularly in capturing the natural flow of conversation, including turn-taking, pauses, and disfluencies. Although speech synthesis systems have made significant progress in generating natural and intelligible speech, primarily through architectures that implicitly model prosodic features such as pitch, intensity, and duration, the construction of datasets with explicit prosodic segmentation and their impact on spontaneous speech synthesis remains largely unexplored. This paper evaluates the effects of manual and automatic prosodic segmentation annotations in Brazilian Portuguese on the quality of speech synthesized by a non-autoregressive model, FastSpeech 2. Experimental results show that training with prosodic segmentation produced slightly more intelligible and acoustically natural speech. While automatic segmentation tends to create more regular segments, manual prosodic segmentation introduces greater variability, which contributes to more natural prosody. Analysis of neutral declarative utterances showed that both training approaches reproduced the expected nuclear accent pattern, but the prosodic model aligned more closely with natural pre-nuclear contours. To support reproducibility and future research, all datasets, source codes, and trained models are publicly available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.