# Streamlining Industrial Contract Management with Retrieval-Augmented LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14671 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14671/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 10 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Legal and financial RAG](https://mlsanity.com/rag/legal-and-financial-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03281/) (2023)
- [CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06268/) (2021)
- [ContractNLI: A Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inference for Contracts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01799/) (2021)
- [A Dataset for Statutory Reasoning in Tax Law Entailment and Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.05257/) (2020)
- [A Benchmark for Lease Contract Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10386/) (2020)
- [Obligation and Prohibition Extraction Using Hierarchical RNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.03871/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Contract management involves reviewing and negotiating provisions, individual clauses that define rights, obligations, and terms of agreement. During this process, revisions to provisions are proposed and iteratively refined, some of which may be problematic or unacceptable. Automating this workflow is challenging due to the scarcity of labeled data and the abundance of unstructured legacy contracts. In this paper, we present a modular framework designed to streamline contract management through a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline. Our system integrates synthetic data generation, semantic clause retrieval, acceptability classification, and reward-based alignment to flag problematic revisions and generate improved alternatives. Developed and evaluated in collaboration with an industry partner, our system achieves over 80% accuracy in both identifying and optimizing problematic revisions, demonstrating strong performance under real-world, low-resource conditions and offering a practical means of accelerating contract revision workflows.