# Imagine in Space: Exploring the Frontier of Spatial Intelligence and Reasoning Efficiency in Vision Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13782 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13782/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in World models for language agents, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- World models / [World models for language agents](https://mlsanity.com/wm/world-models-for-language-agents/)
- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01785/) (2025)
- [Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16999/) (2024)
- [Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10442/) (2024)
- [Imagine while Reasoning in Space: Multimodal Visualization-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07542/) (2025)
- [Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12605/) (2025)
- [Mulberry: Empowering MLLM with o1-like Reasoning and Reflection via Collective Monte Carlo Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18319/) (2024)
- [Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01773/) (2025)
- [Boosting the Generalization and Reasoning of Vision Language Models with Curriculum Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07065/) (2025)
- [3D-LLaVA: Towards Generalist 3D LMMs with Omni Superpoint Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01163/) (2025)
- [WMNav: Integrating Vision-Language Models into World Models for Object Goal Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02247/) (2025)
- [SPARTUN3D: Situated Spatial Understanding of 3D World in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03878/) (2024)
- [Are Language Models Puzzle Prodigies? Algorithmic Puzzles Unveil Serious Challenges in Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03864/) (2024)
- [Mind with Eyes: from Language Reasoning to Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18071/) (2025)
- [Kestrel: 3D Multimodal LLM for Part-Aware Grounded Description](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18937/) (2024)
- [Integrating Chain-of-Thought for Multimodal Alignment: A Study on 3D Vision-Language Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06232/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [CausalSpatial: A Benchmark for Object-Centric Causal Spatial Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13304/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs), such as DeepSeek R1,OpenAI o3, and Gemini 2.5 Pro, have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across logical inference, problem solving, and decision making. However, spatial reasoning:a fundamental component of human cognition that includes mental rotation, navigation, and spatial relationship comprehension remains a significant challenge for current advanced VLMs. We hypothesize that imagination, the internal simulation of spatial states, is the dominant reasoning mechanism within a spatial world model. To test this hypothesis and systematically probe current VLM spatial reasoning mechanisms, we introduce SpatiaLite, a fully synthetic benchmark that jointly measures spatial reasoning accuracy and reasoning efficiency. Comprehensive experiments reveal three key findings. First, advanced VLMs predominantly rely on linguistic representations for reasoning and imagination, resulting in significant deficiencies on visual centric tasks that demand perceptual spatial relations and 3D geometry transformations such as mental rotation or projection prediction. Second, advanced VLMs exhibit severe inefficiency in their current spatial reasoning mechanisms, with token usage growing rapidly as transformation complexity increases. Third, we propose an Imagery Driven Framework (IDF) for data synthesis and training, which can implicitly construct an internal world model that is critical for spatial reasoning in VLMs. Building on SpatiaLite, this work delineates the spatial reasoning limits and patterns of advanced VLMs, identifies key shortcomings, and informs future advances