# Scalable Vision-Guided Crop Yield Estimation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12999 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.12999/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Predictions as Surrogates: Revisiting Surrogate Outcomes in the Age of AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09731/) (2025)
- [DeepCorn: A Semi-Supervised Deep Learning Method for High-Throughput Image-Based Corn Kernel Counting and Yield Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.10521/) (2020)
- [A Note on the Prediction-Powered Bootstrap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18379/) (2024)
- [Meta-Learners for Estimation of Causal Effects: Finite Sample Cross-Fit Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12692/) (2022)
- [Efficient estimation and data fusion under general semiparametric restrictions on outcome mean functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06941/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [FinInvest-GTCN: Explainable Graph-Temporal-Causal Modeling for Risk-Aware Investment Decision Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.28933/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Precise estimation and uncertainty quantification for average crop yields are critical for agricultural monitoring and decision making. Existing data collection methods, such as crop cuts in randomly sampled fields at harvest time, are relatively time-consuming. Thus, we propose an approach based on prediction-powered inference (PPI) to supplement these crop cuts with less time-consuming field photos. After training a computer vision model to predict the ground truth crop cut yields from the photos, we learn a ``control function" that recalibrates these predictions with the spatial coordinates of each field. This enables fields with photos but not crop cuts to be leveraged to improve the precision of zone-wide average yield estimates. Our control function is learned by training on a dataset of nearly 20,000 real crop cuts and photos of rice and maize fields in sub-Saharan Africa. To improve precision, we pool training observations across different zones within the same first-level subdivision of each country. Our final PPI-based point estimates of the average yield are provably asymptotically unbiased and cannot increase the asymptotic variance beyond that of the natural baseline estimator -- the sample average of the crop cuts -- as the number of fields grows. We also propose a novel bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap to construct accompanying confidence intervals. Even in zones with as few as 20 fields, the point estimates show significant empirical improvement over the baseline, increasing the effective sample size by as much as 73% for rice and by 12-23% for maize. The confidence intervals are accordingly shorter at minimal cost to empirical finite-sample coverage. This demonstrates the potential for relatively low-cost images to make area-based crop insurance more affordable and thus spur investment into sustainable agricultural practices.