# A Reasoning Paradigm for Named Entity Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11978 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.11978/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 11 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08691/) (2023)
- [InstructUIE: Multi-task Instruction Tuning for Unified Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08085/) (2023)
- [GPT-NER: Named Entity Recognition via Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10428/) (2023)
- [Liger Kernel: Efficient Triton Kernels for LLM Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10989/) (2024)
- [UniversalNER: Targeted Distillation from Large Language Models for Open Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03279/) (2023)
- [PromptNER: Prompting For Named Entity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15444/) (2023)
- [Named Entity Recognition in Twitter: A Dataset and Analysis on Short-Term Temporal Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03797/) (2022)
- [Think Inside the JSON: Reinforcement Strategy for Strict LLM Schema Adherence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14905/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Generative LLMs typically improve Named Entity Recognition (NER) performance through instruction tuning. They excel at generating entities by semantic pattern matching but lack an explicit, verifiable reasoning mechanism. This "cognitive shortcutting" leads to suboptimal performance and brittle generalization, especially in zero-shot and lowresource scenarios where reasoning from limited contextual cues is crucial. To address this issue, a reasoning framework is proposed for NER, which shifts the extraction paradigm from implicit pattern matching to explicit reasoning. This framework consists of three stages: Chain of Thought (CoT) generation, CoT tuning, and reasoning enhancement. First, a dataset annotated with NER-oriented CoTs is generated, which contain task-relevant reasoning chains. Then, they are used to tune the NER model to generate coherent rationales before deriving the final answer. Finally, a reasoning enhancement stage is implemented to optimize the reasoning process using a comprehensive reward signal. This stage ensures explicit and verifiable extractions. Experiments show that ReasoningNER demonstrates impressive cognitive ability in the NER task, achieving competitive performance. In zero-shot settings, it achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, outperforming GPT-4 by 12.3 percentage points on the F1 score. Analytical results also demonstrate its great potential to advance research in reasoningoriented information extraction. Our codes are available at https://github.com/HuiResearch/ReasoningIE.