# Which Sparse Autoencoder Features Are Real? Model-X Knockoffs for False Discovery Rate Control

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11711 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.11711/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability.
- Builds on 11 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Mechanistic interpretability / [Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/sparse-autoencoder-training-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01373/) (2023)
- [Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08600/) (2023)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14997/) (2023)
- [Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04093/) (2024)
- [Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02351/) (2016)
- [Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1404.5609/) (2014)
- [DeepPINK: reproducible feature selection in deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01185/) (2018)
- [Fast and Powerful Conditional Randomization Testing via Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03980/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Learning from Negative Examples: Why Warning-Framed Training Data Teaches What It Warns Against](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22293/) (2025)
- [What Do Sparse Autoencoder Feature Discovery Scores Identify? From Activations to Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15850/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Although sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are crucial for identifying interpretable features in neural networks, it is still challenging to distinguish between real computational patterns and erroneous correlations. We introduce Model-X knockoffs to SAE feature selection, using knock-off+ to control the false discovery rate (FDR) with finite-sample guarantees under the standard Model-X assumptions (in our case, via a Gaussian surrogate for the latent distribution). We select 129 features at a target FDR q=0.1 after analyzing 512 high-activity SAE latents for sentiment classification using Pythia-70M. About 25% of the latents under examination carry task-relevant signal, whereas 75% do not, according to the chosen set, which displays a 5.40x separation in knockoff statistics compared to non-selected features. Our method offers a re-producible and principled framework for reliable feature discovery by combining SAEs with multiple-testing-aware inference, advancing the foundations of mechanistic interpretability.
