# VP-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Visual Prompting in Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11438 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.11438/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 3 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [Set-of-Mark Prompting Unleashes Extraordinary Visual Grounding in GPT-4V](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11441/) (2023)
- [Migician: Revealing the Magic of Free-Form Multi-Image Grounding in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05767/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [When the Prompt Becomes Visual: Vision-Centric Jailbreak Attacks for Large Image Editing Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10179/) (2026)
- [VPA-Guard: Defending and Benchmarking Image-to-Video Generation Against Visual Prompt Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.25592/) (2026)
- [HighlightBench: Benchmarking Markup-Driven Table Reasoning in Scientific Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.26784/) (2026)
- [Compositionality Emerges in a Narrow Depth-Connectivity Regime: Architecture Constraints and Solution Manifolds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19941/) (2026)
- [Render to Reason: Novel-View Semantic Prediction Improves Spatial Understanding in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05417/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have enabled a wide range of advanced vision-language applications, including fine-grained object recognition and contextual understanding. When querying specific regions or objects in an image, human users naturally use "visual prompts" (VPs), such as bounding boxes, to provide reference. However, no existing benchmark systematically evaluates the ability of MLLMs to interpret such VPs. This gap leaves it unclear whether current MLLMs can effectively recognize VPs, an intuitive prompting method for humans, and use them to solve problems. To address this limitation, we introduce VP-Bench, a benchmark for assessing MLLMs' capability in VP perception and utilization. VP-Bench employs a two-stage evaluation framework: Stage 1 examines models' ability to perceive VPs in natural scenes, using 30k visualized prompts spanning eight shapes and 355 attribute combinations. Stage 2 investigates the impact of VPs on downstream tasks, measuring their effectiveness in real-world problem-solving scenarios. Using VP-Bench, we evaluate 28 MLLMs, including proprietary systems (e.g., GPT-4o) and open-source models (e.g., InternVL3 and Qwen2.5-VL), and provide a comprehensive analysis of factors that affect VP understanding, such as variations in VP attributes, question arrangement, and model scale. VP-Bench establishes a new reference framework for studying how MLLMs comprehend and resolve grounded referring questions.