# SURFACEBENCH: A Geometry-Aware Benchmark for Symbolic Surface Discovery

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10833 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10833/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.05103/) (2019)
- [Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03828/) (2018)
- [A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00603/) (2016)
- [AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11481/) (2019)
- [AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05384/) (2018)
- [PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09668/) (2017)
- [Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04871/) (2019)
- [Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.14351/) (2021)
- [End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10532/) (2022)
- [Neural Symbolic Regression that Scales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06427/) (2021)
- [LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18400/) (2024)
- [LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09783/) (2024)
- [Symbolic Regression with a Learned Concept Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09359/) (2024)
- [Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06833/) (2023)
- [LLM-SRBench: A New Benchmark for Scientific Equation Discovery with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10415/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Symbolic Regression Datasets and Benchmarks for Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10540/) (2022)
- [Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11427/) (2024)
- [EGG-SR: Embedding Symbolic Equivalence into Symbolic Regression via Equality Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05849/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [LLM-AutoSciLab: Closed-Loop Scientific Discovery via Active Experimentation with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24043/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Equation discovery from data is a central challenge in machine learning for science, which requires the recovery of concise symbolic expressions that govern complex physical and geometric phenomena. Recent large language model (LLM) approaches have shown promise in symbolic regression, yet existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate low-dimensional scalar functions and rely on string-level or regression-based metrics that fail to capture structural and geometric equivalence. We introduce SURFACEBENCH, the first geometry-aware benchmark for symbolic discovery of three-dimensional surfaces. Unlike scalar curve-fitting tasks, SURFACEBENCH targets surface-level reasoning, where multi-variable coupling, coordinate transformations, and geometric structure must be inferred directly from data. The benchmark comprises 183 analytically constructed, science-inspired surface equations across 15 categories and three representation paradigms: explicit, implicit, and parametric forms. Each task includes variable semantics and synthetically sampled 3D data, and is designed to stress symbolic composition, structural ambiguity, and representational non-uniqueness while mitigating memorization. To evaluate discovery quality, SURFACEBENCH incorporates symbolic equivalence checks with geometric metrics of the object-space (Chamfer and Hausdorff distances) and regression-based error measures, allowing evaluation of functional fidelity beyond algebraic syntax. Empirical evaluation across evolutionary, neural, and LLM-driven frameworks reveals that no current method achieves consistent performance across representation types, with LLM-based approaches exhibiting strong structural priors but limited robustness in parameter calibration and multi-equation reasoning.The code and data are available at this link: github.com/deep-symbolic-mathematics/surfacebench.