# nuPlan-R: A Closed-Loop Planning Benchmark for Autonomous Driving via Reactive Multi-Agent Simulation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10403 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10403/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Imitation-learning end-to-end planners, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 30 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Imitation-learning end-to-end planners](https://mlsanity.com/driving/imitation-learning-end-to-end-planners/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11027/) (2019)
- [CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03938/) (2017)
- [Diffusion Forcing: Next-token Prediction Meets Full-Sequence Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01392/) (2024)
- [Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10133/) (2021)
- [NuPlan: A closed-loop ML-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehicles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11810/) (2021)
- [NAVSIM: Data-Driven Non-Reactive Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15349/) (2024)
- [Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03877/) (2024)
- [Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07962/) (2023)
- [MotionDiffuser: Controllable Multi-Agent Motion Prediction using Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03083/) (2023)
- [TrafficSim: Learning to Simulate Realistic Multi-Agent Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06557/) (2021)
- [Guided Conditional Diffusion for Controllable Traffic Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17366/) (2022)
- [Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08710/) (2023)
- [MotionLM: Multi-Agent Motion Forecasting as Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16534/) (2023)
- [Diffusion-Based Planning for Autonomous Driving with Flexible Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15564/) (2025)
- [Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13333/) (2021)
- [Language-Guided Traffic Simulation via Scene-Level Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06344/) (2023)
- [BITS: Bi-level Imitation for Traffic Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12403/) (2022)
- [SimNet: Learning Reactive Self-driving Simulations from Real-world Observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12332/) (2021)
- [Trajeglish: Traffic Modeling as Next-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04535/) (2023)
- [From Prediction to Planning With Goal Conditioned Lane Graph Traversals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07753/) (2023)
- [Closed-Loop Supervised Fine-Tuning of Tokenized Traffic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05334/) (2024)
- [AdvDiffuser: Generating Adversarial Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios via Guided Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08453/) (2024)
- [Diffusion Models for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15816/) (2024)
- [Bench2Drive-R: Turning Real World Data into Reactive Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving Benchmark by Generative Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09647/) (2024)
- [CALMM-Drive: Confidence-Aware Autonomous Driving with Large Multimodal Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04209/) (2024)
- [Decoupled Diffusion Sparks Adaptive Scene Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10485/) (2025)
- [LD-Scene: LLM-Guided Diffusion for Controllable Generation of Adversarial Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11247/) (2025)
- [Safety-Critical Traffic Simulation with Guided Latent Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00515/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Agent-driven Long-tail Simulation for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04331/) (2026)
- [Shift & Drift: A Zero-Shot Benchmark for Generalizable and Robust Autonomous Driving Motion Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07844/) (2026)
- [Real-Time Rulebook-Aware Nonlinear MPC for Autonomous Driving with Priority-Biased Tiered Slacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10975/) (2026)
- [Human Behavior-Informed Crash Scenario Generation with Real-World Crash Priors for Autonomous Vehicle Safety Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04366/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in closed-loop planning benchmarks have significantly improved the evaluation of autonomous vehicles. However, existing benchmarks still rely on rule-based reactive agents such as the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM), which lack behavioral diversity and fail to capture realistic human interactions, leading to oversimplified traffic dynamics. To address these limitations, we present nuPlan-R, a new reactive closed-loop planning benchmark that integrates learning-based reactive multi-agent simulation into the nuPlan framework. Our benchmark replaces the rule-based IDM agents with noise-decoupled diffusion-based reactive agents and introduces an interaction-aware agent selection mechanism to ensure both realism and computational efficiency. Furthermore, we extend the benchmark with two additional metrics to enable a more comprehensive assessment of planning performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our reactive agent model produces more realistic, diverse, and human-like traffic behaviors, leading to a benchmark environment that better reflects real-world interactive driving. We further reimplement a collection of rule-based, learning-based, and hybrid planning approaches within our nuPlan-R benchmark, providing a clearer reflection of planner performance in complex interactive scenarios and better highlighting the advantages of learning-based planners in handling complex and dynamic scenarios. These results establish nuPlan-R as a new standard for fair, reactive, and realistic closed-loop planning evaluation. We will open-source the code for the new benchmark.