# Cogent argument extensions are weakly admissible but not vice versa

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09600 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.09600/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Tenability and Weak Semantics: Modeling Non-uniform Defense -- Extended Version](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02024/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this research note, we show the relationship between two non-admissible argumentation framework semantics: cogent and weakly admissible semantics. We prove that, while cogent extensions are weakly admissible, the converse is not true.
