# MM-CRITIC: A Holistic Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models as Multimodal Critique

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09067 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.09067/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [VideoLLaMA 2: Advancing Spatial-Temporal Modeling and Audio Understanding in Video-LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07476/) (2024)
- [MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04788/) (2024)
- [JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12784/) (2024)
- [ScreenSpot-Pro: GUI Grounding for Professional High-Resolution Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07981/) (2025)
- [Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03188/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13446/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12605/) (2025)
- [AuroraCap: Efficient, Performant Video Detailed Captioning and a New Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03051/) (2024)
- [Aria-UI: Visual Grounding for GUI Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16256/) (2024)
- [GTA1: GUI Test-time Scaling Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05791/) (2025)
- [Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.04592/) (2023)
- [MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14704/) (2025)
- [CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14809/) (2024)
- [VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.17451/) (2024)
- [GOAT-Bench: Safety Insights to Large Multimodal Models through Meme-Based Social Abuse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01523/) (2024)
- [Critic-V: VLM Critics Help Catch VLM Errors in Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.18203/) (2024)
- [MMCode: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Code Generation with Visually Rich Programming Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09486/) (2024)
- [Diving into Self-Evolving Training for Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17451/) (2024)
- [Multi-modal Preference Alignment Remedies Degradation of Visual Instruction Tuning on Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10884/) (2024)
- [Towards Low-Resource Harmful Meme Detection with LMM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05383/) (2024)
- [SpaCE-10: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Compositional Spatial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07966/) (2025)
- [FACT-AUDIT: An Adaptive Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic Fact-Checking Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17924/) (2025)
- [VideoAutoArena: An Automated Arena for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Video Analysis through User Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13281/) (2024)
- [A Large Language Model Approach to Educational Survey Feedback Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17447/) (2023)
- [On the Intersection of Self-Correction and Trust in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.02801/) (2023)
- [AdamMeme: Adaptively Probe the Reasoning Capacity of Multimodal Large Language Models on Harmfulness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01702/) (2025)
- [ScratchEval: Are GPT-4o Smarter than My Child? Evaluating Large Multimodal Models with Visual Programming Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.18932/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Multi-Crit: Benchmarking Multimodal Judges on Pluralistic Criteria-Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21662/) (2025)
- [MM-JudgeBias: A Benchmark for Evaluating Compositional Biases in MLLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.18164/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The ability of critique is vital for models to self-improve and serve as reliable AI assistants. While extensively studied in language-only settings, multimodal critique of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) remains underexplored despite their growing capabilities in tasks like captioning and visual reasoning. In this work, we introduce MM-CRITIC, a holistic benchmark for evaluating the critique ability of LMMs across multiple dimensions: basic, correction, and comparison. Covering 8 main task types and over 500 tasks, MM-CRITIC collects responses from various LMMs with different model sizes and is composed of 4471 samples. To enhance the evaluation reliability, we integrate expert-informed ground answers into scoring rubrics that guide GPT-4o in annotating responses and generating reference critiques, which serve as anchors for trustworthy judgments. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of MM-CRITIC and provide a comprehensive assessment of leading LMMs' critique capabilities under multiple dimensions. Further analysis reveals some key insights, including the correlation between response quality and critique, and varying critique difficulty across evaluation dimensions. Our code is available at https://github.com/MichealZeng0420/MM-Critic.