# Dual-Process Scaffold Reasoning for Enhancing LLM Code Debugging

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08052 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08052/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Chain of Agents: Large Language Models Collaborating on Long-Context Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02818/) (2024)
- [Distilling System 2 into System 1](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06023/) (2024)
- [The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04925/) (2024)
- [Debug like a Human: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16906/) (2024)
- [DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04621/) (2024)
- [PEARL: Prompting Large Language Models to Plan and Execute Actions Over Long Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14564/) (2023)
- [Evolving Deeper LLM Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09891/) (2025)
- [Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03441/) (2024)
- [Disentangling Logic: The Role of Context in Large Language Model Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02787/) (2024)
- [ThinkLess: A Training-Free Inference-Efficient Method for Reducing Reasoning Redundancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15684/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning Patterns](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14812/) (2024)
- [Efficient Reasoning via Chain of Unconscious Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19756/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Graph Enhanced Exemplars Retrieval for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.11147/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent LLMs have demonstrated sophisticated problem-solving capabilities on various benchmarks through advanced reasoning algorithms. However, the key research question of identifying reasoning steps that balance complexity and computational efficiency remains unsolved. Recent research has increasingly drawn upon psychological theories to explore strategies for optimizing cognitive pathways. The LLM's final outputs and intermediate steps are regarded as System 1 and System 2, respectively. However, an in-depth exploration of the System 2 reasoning is still lacking. Therefore, we propose a novel psychologically backed Scaffold Reasoning framework for code debugging, which encompasses the Scaffold Stream, Analytic Stream, and Integration Stream. The construction of reference code within the Scaffold Stream is integrated with the buggy code analysis results produced by the Analytic Stream through the Integration Stream. Our framework achieves an 88.91% pass rate and an average inference time of 5.36 seconds per-problem on DebugBench, outperforming other reasoning approaches across various LLMs in both reasoning accuracy and efficiency. Further analyses elucidate the advantages and limitations of various cognitive pathways across varying problem difficulties and bug types. Our findings also corroborate the alignment of the proposed Scaffold Reasoning framework with human cognitive processes.