# ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07685 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07685/

## Key facts

- Cited by 84 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.13657/) (2025)
- [Humanity's Last Exam](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14249/) (2025)
- [Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientist](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18864/) (2025)
- [DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11763/) (2025)
- [Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12941/) (2024)
- [Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18096/) (2025)
- [Mind2Web 2: Evaluating Agentic Search with Agent-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21506/) (2025)
- [ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21248/) (2025)
- [DeepResearchGym: A Free, Transparent, and Reproducible Evaluation Sandbox for Deep Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19253/) (2025)
- [Limits to scalable evaluation at the frontier: LLM as Judge won't beat twice the data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13341/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Research: Systems, Methodologies, and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12594/) (2025)
- [ReportBench: Evaluating Deep Research Agents via Academic Survey Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15804/) (2025)
- [DeepScholar-Bench: A Live Benchmark and Automated Evaluation for Generative Research Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.20033/) (2025)
- [Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04183/) (2025)
- [When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11855/) (2025)
- [ExpertLongBench: Benchmarking Language Models on Expert-Level Long-Form Generation Tasks with Structured Checklists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01241/) (2025)
- [DeepResearch Arena: The First Exam of LLMs' Research Abilities via Seminar-Grounded Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01396/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 84)

- [Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.24653/) (2026)
- [DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08536/) (2026)
- [Reward Hacking in the Era of Large Models: Mechanisms, Emergent Misalignment, Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13602/) (2026)
- [Reward Hacking in Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12474/) (2026)
- [DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04324/) (2025)
- [Audio MultiChallenge: A Multi-Turn Evaluation of Spoken Dialogue Systems on Natural Human Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14865/) (2025)
- [Learning Query-Specific Rubrics from Human Preferences for DeepResearch Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03619/) (2026)
- [Agentic Aggregation for Parallel Scaling of Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11753/) (2026)
- [Rubric-Guided Self-Distillation: Post-Training Without Rubric Verifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12507/) (2026)
- [DRACO: a Cross-Domain Benchmark for Deep Research Accuracy, Completeness, and Objectivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11685/) (2026)
- [DEER: A Benchmark for Evaluating Deep Research Agents on Expert Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.17776/) (2025)
- [Step-DeepResearch Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20491/) (2025)
- [RubricRAG: Towards Interpretable and Reliable LLM Evaluation via Domain Knowledge Retrieval for Rubric Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20882/) (2026)
- [QUEST: Training Frontier Deep Research Agents with Fully Synthetic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24218/) (2026)
- [Nanbeige4.2-3B: Unlocking Agentic Capabilities in a Compact Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22083/) (2026)
- [DeepFact: Co-Evolving Benchmarks and Agents for Deep Research Factuality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05912/) (2026)
- [Rubrics to Tokens: Bridging Response-level Rubrics and Token-level Rewards in Instruction Following Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02795/) (2026)
- [Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19196/) (2026)
- [ShoppingComp: Are LLMs Really Ready for Your Shopping Cart?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.22978/) (2025)
- [From Fluent to Verifiable: Claim-Level Auditability for Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13855/) (2026)
- [DREAM: Deep Research Evaluation with Agentic Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.18940/) (2026)
- [Tournament-GRPO: Group-Wise Tournament Rewards for Reinforcement Learning in Open-Ended Long-Form Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26958/) (2026)
- [SCOPE: Self-Play via Co-Evolving Policies for Open-Ended Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31433/) (2026)
- [Can LLM-as-a-Judge Reliably Verify Rubrics in Agentic Scenarios?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29920/) (2026)
- [The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.18458/) (2026)
- [SWE Atlas: Benchmarking Coding Agents Beyond Issue Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08366/) (2026)
- [Can LLMs Write Reliable Rubrics? A Meta-Evaluation for Experiment Reproduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.12835/) (2026)
- [Deep Research, Shallow Evaluation: A Case Study in Meta-Evaluation for Long-Form QA Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06942/) (2026)
- [Total Recall QA: A Verifiable Evaluation Suite for Deep Research Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18516/) (2026)
- [JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25240/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Research (DR) is an emerging agent application that leverages large language models (LLMs) to address open-ended queries. It requires the integration of several capabilities, including multi-step reasoning, cross-document synthesis, and the generation of evidence-backed, long-form answers. Evaluating DR remains challenging because responses are lengthy and diverse, admit many valid solutions, and often depend on dynamic information sources. We introduce ResearchRubrics, a standardized benchmark for DR built with over 2,800+ hours of human labor that pairs realistic, domain-diverse prompts with 2,500+ expert-written, fine-grained rubrics to assess factual grounding, reasoning soundness, and clarity. We also propose a new complexity framework for categorizing DR tasks along three axes: conceptual breadth, logical nesting, and exploration. In addition, we develop human and model-based evaluation protocols that measure rubric adherence for DR agents. We evaluate several state-of-the-art DR systems and find that even leading agents like Gemini's DR and OpenAI's DR achieve under 68% average compliance with our rubrics, primarily due to missed implicit context and inadequate reasoning about retrieved information. Our results highlight the need for robust, scalable assessment of deep research capabilities, to which end we release ResearchRubrics(including all prompts, rubrics, and evaluation code) to facilitate progress toward well-justified research assistants.