# Importance-Aware Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction Tuning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07074 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07074/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07705/) (2022)
- [AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14387/) (2023)
- [The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13688/) (2023)
- [C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07597/) (2023)
- [Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.15004/) (2023)
- [LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03387/) (2025)
- [Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02707/) (2023)
- [Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05672/) (2024)
- [What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15685/) (2023)
- [Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03169/) (2023)
- [From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12032/) (2023)
- [Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instruct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02120/) (2023)
- [mGTE: Generalized Long-Context Text Representation and Reranking Models for Multilingual Text Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19669/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15895/) (2023)
- [WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04770/) (2024)
- [Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11038/) (2021)
- [MMC: Advancing Multimodal Chart Understanding with Large-scale Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10774/) (2023)
- [Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00530/) (2024)
- [On the Exploitability of Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17194/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05123/) (2024)
- [Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.14736/) (2023)
- [Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00288/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16725/) (2026)
- [ProFit: Leveraging High-Value Signals in SFT via Probability-Guided Token Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09195/) (2026)
- [Co-EPG: A Framework for Co-Evolution of Planning and Grounding in Autonomous GUI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10705/) (2025)
- [AIR: Post-training Data Selection for Reasoning via Attention Head Influence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13279/) (2025)
- [Reliability-Aware Determinantal Point Processes for Robust Informative Data Selection in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00885/) (2026)
- [On Representation Redundancy in Large-Scale Instruction Tuning Data Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13773/) (2026)
- [Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29144/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning plays a critical role in enhancing the performance and efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs). Its success depends not only on the quality of the instruction data but also on the inherent capabilities of the LLM itself. Some studies suggest that even a small amount of high-quality data can achieve instruction fine-tuning results that are on par with, or even exceed, those from using a full-scale dataset. However, rather than focusing solely on calculating data quality scores to evaluate instruction data, there is a growing need to select high-quality data that maximally enhances the performance of instruction tuning for a given LLM. In this paper, we propose the Model Instruction Weakness Value (MIWV) as a novel metric to quantify the importance of instruction data in enhancing model's capabilities. The MIWV metric is derived from the discrepancies in the model's responses when using In-Context Learning (ICL), helping identify the most beneficial data for enhancing instruction tuning performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that selecting only the top 1% of data based on MIWV can outperform training on the full dataset. Furthermore, this approach extends beyond existing research that focuses on data quality scoring for data selection, offering strong empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of our proposed method.