# OckBench: Measuring the Efficiency of LLM Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05722 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05722/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 34 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14135/) (2022)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16084/) (2025)
- [AReaL: A Large-Scale Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24298/) (2025)
- [QServe: W4A8KV4 Quantization and System Co-design for Efficient LLM Serving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04532/) (2024)
- [GEAR: An Efficient KV Cache Compression Recipe for Near-Lossless Generative Inference of LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05527/) (2024)
- [AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16400/) (2025)
- [How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09598/) (2025)
- [Energy Considerations of Large Language Model Inference and Efficiency Optimizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17674/) (2025)
- [Reasoning in Token Economies: Budget-Aware Evaluation of LLM Reasoning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06461/) (2024)
- [AMO-Bench: Large Language Models Still Struggle in High School Math Competitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26768/) (2025)
- [ReaL: Efficient RLHF Training of Large Language Models with Parameter Reallocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14088/) (2024)
- [THOUGHTTERMINATOR: Benchmarking, Calibrating, and Mitigating Overthinking in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13367/) (2025)
- [OptimalThinkingBench: Evaluating Over and Underthinking in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13141/) (2025)
- [Plan and Budget: Effective and Efficient Test-Time Scaling on Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16122/) (2025)
- [THINK-Bench: Evaluating Thinking Efficiency and Chain-of-Thought Quality of Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22113/) (2025)
- [Walk Before You Run! Concise LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21178/) (2025)
- [Towards Sustainable NLP: Insights from Benchmarking Inference Energy in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05610/) (2025)
- [Revisiting Model Interpolation for Efficient Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10977/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [El Agente Gr'afico: A Semantic Execution Runtime for Scientific Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.17902/) (2026)
- [OpenSkillEval: Automatically Auditing the Open Skill Ecosystem for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23657/) (2026)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Decomposing the Reasoning Efficiency of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09805/) (2026)
- [CurveShift: Is Agent Progress Scalar? Separating Level from Shape](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00355/) (2026)
- [GraphRAG for Engineering Diagrams: ChatP&ID Enables LLM Interaction with P&IDs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22528/) (2026)
- [JoyAI-LLM Flash: Advancing Mid-Scale LLMs with Token Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03044/) (2026)
- [Cross-Lingual Token Arbitrage: Optimizing Code Agent Context Windows via Local LLM Preprocessing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03618/) (2026)
- [Brevity is the Soul of Inference Efficiency: Inducing Concision in VLMs via Data Curation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.25432/) (2026)
- [When Does LLM Orchestration Pay Off? A Controlled Evaluation of Accuracy, Cost, and Task Difficulty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00685/) (2026)
- [The Reasoning Tax: Token Economics of LLM Reasoning Across Task Types and Deployment Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.26235/) (2026)
- [Reputation as Community Memory for the Agentic Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19502/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-5 and Gemini 3 have pushed the frontier of automated reasoning and code generation. Yet current benchmarks emphasize accuracy and output quality, neglecting a critical dimension: efficiency of token usage. The token efficiency is highly variable in practical. Models solving the same problem with similar accuracy can exhibit up to a 5.0× difference in token length, leading to massive gap of model reasoning ability. Such variance exposes significant redundancy, highlighting the critical need for a standardized benchmark to quantify the gap of token efficiency. Thus, we introduce OckBench, the first benchmark that jointly measures accuracy and token efficiency across reasoning and coding tasks. Our evaluation reveals that token efficiency remains largely unoptimized across current models, significantly inflating serving costs and latency. These findings provide a concrete roadmap for the community to optimize the latent reasoning ability, token efficiency. Ultimately, we argue for an evaluation paradigm shift: tokens must not be multiplied beyond necessity. Our benchmarks are available at https://ockbench.github.io/.