# Sketch-Augmented Features Improve Learning Long-Range Dependencies in Graph Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03824 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03824/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 53 of its 72 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00826/) (2018)
- [Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01212/) (2017)
- [Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07606/) (2018)
- [Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12265/) (2019)
- [Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02244/) (2018)
- [Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.02133/) (2020)
- [How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14491/) (2021)
- [Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12454/) (2022)
- [DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10903/) (2019)
- [Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.00982/) (2020)
- [On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05205/) (2020)
- [DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go as Deep as CNNs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03751/) (2019)
- [Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvature](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.14522/) (2021)
- [Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03893/) (2021)
- [Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.09902/) (2018)
- [Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09252/) (2020)
- [Mesh Graphormer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00272/) (2021)
- [Long Range Graph Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08164/) (2022)
- [A Note on Over-Smoothing for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13318/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10993/) (2023)
- [A Survey of the Recent Architectures of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.06032/) (2019)
- [The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initialization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01179/) (2020)
- [Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02505/) (2022)
- [Random Features Strengthen Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.03155/) (2020)
- [Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13013/) (2022)
- [On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and Topology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02941/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Graph Rewiring in GNNs to Mitigate Over-Squashing and Over-Smoothing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00951/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Graph Neural Networks learn on graph-structured data by iteratively aggregating local neighborhood information. While this local message passing paradigm imparts a powerful inductive bias and exploits graph sparsity, it also yields three key challenges: (i) oversquashing of long-range information, (ii) oversmoothing of node representations, and (iii) limited expressive power. In this work we inject randomized global embeddings of node features, which we term textitSketched Random Features, into standard GNNs, enabling them to efficiently capture long-range dependencies. The embeddings are unique, distance-sensitive, and topology-agnostic -- properties which we analytically and empirically show alleviate the aforementioned limitations when injected into GNNs. Experimental results on real-world graph learning tasks confirm that this strategy consistently improves performance over baseline GNNs, offering both a standalone solution and a complementary enhancement to existing techniques such as graph positional encodings. Our source code is available at hrefhttps://github.com/ryienh/sketched-random-featureshttps://github.com/ryienh/sketched-random-features.