# What's in Common? Multimodal Models Hallucinate When Reasoning Across Scenes

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03768 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03768/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 41 of its 84 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM training and visual instruction tuning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-training-and-visual-instruction-tuning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16241/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12231/) (2018)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06209/) (2024)
- [When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01936/) (2022)
- [DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10302/) (2024)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03882/) (2023)
- [NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17428/) (2024)
- [MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13257/) (2024)
- [MIMIC-IT: Multi-Modal In-Context Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05425/) (2023)
- [ThreeDWorld: A Platform for Interactive Multi-Modal Physical Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04954/) (2020)
- [An Introduction to Vision-Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17247/) (2024)
- [LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06186/) (2025)
- [PerceptionLM: Open-Access Data and Models for Detailed Visual Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13180/) (2025)
- [MMIU: Multimodal Multi-image Understanding for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02718/) (2024)
- [Visual Haystacks: A Vision-Centric Needle-In-A-Haystack Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13766/) (2024)
- [VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07112/) (2024)
- [SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11171/) (2024)
- [Mass-Producing Failures of Multimodal Systems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12105/) (2023)
- [PUG: Photorealistic and Semantically Controllable Synthetic Data for Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03977/) (2023)
- [UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04810/) (2024)
- [An Image is Worth More Than a Thousand Words: Towards Disentanglement in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15610/) (2021)
- [LLMs Are Biased Towards Output Formats! Systematically Evaluating and Mitigating Output Format Bias of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08656/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal language models possess a remarkable ability to handle an open-vocabulary's worth of objects. Yet the best models still suffer from hallucinations when reasoning about scenes in the real world, revealing a gap between their seemingly strong performance on existing perception benchmarks that are saturating and their reasoning in the real world. To address this gap, we build a novel benchmark of in-the-wild scenes that we call Common-O. With more than 10.5k examples using exclusively new images not found in web training data to avoid contamination, Common-O goes beyond just perception, inspired by cognitive tests for humans, to probe reasoning across scenes by asking "what's in common?". We evaluate leading multimodal language models, including models specifically trained to perform chain-of-thought reasoning. We find that perceiving objects in single images is tractable for most models, yet reasoning across scenes is very challenging even for the best models, including reasoning models. Despite saturating many leaderboards focusing on perception, the best performing model only achieves 35% on Common-O -- and on Common-O Complex, consisting of more complex scenes, the best model achieves only 1%. Curiously, we find models are more prone to hallucinate when similar objects are present in the scene, suggesting models may be relying on object co-occurrence seen during training. Among the models we evaluated, we found scale can provide modest improvements while models explicitly trained with multi-image inputs show bigger improvements, suggesting scaled multi-image training may offer promise. We make our benchmark publicly available to spur research into the challenge of hallucination when reasoning across scenes.