# When Visualizing is the First Step to Reasoning: MIRA, a Benchmark for Visual Chain-of-Thought

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02779 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02779/

## Key facts

- Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 43 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 43)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [Modeling Context in Referring Expressions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.00272/) (2016)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02283/) (2015)
- [Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14683/) (2025)
- [Janus-Pro: Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation with Data and Model Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17811/) (2025)
- [Show-o: One Single Transformer to Unify Multimodal Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12528/) (2024)
- [Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03493/) (2022)
- [Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04671/) (2023)
- [ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08128/) (2023)
- [Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11559/) (2022)
- [MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02813/) (2024)
- [BLIP3-o: A Family of Fully Open Unified Multimodal Models-Architecture, Training and Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09568/) (2025)
- [Seed1.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07062/) (2025)
- [MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13257/) (2024)
- [Visual CoT: Advancing Multi-Modal Language Models with a Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16999/) (2024)
- [Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09403/) (2024)
- [HiDream-I1: A High-Efficient Image Generative Foundation Model with Sparse Diffusion Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22705/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Visual Generation Unlocks Human-Like Reasoning through Multimodal World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19834/) (2026)
- [Visual Reasoning Tracer: Object-Level Grounded Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.05091/) (2025)
- [UniT: Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Test-time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12279/) (2026)
- [MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02465/) (2026)
- [VBVR-Pro: A Scalable and Verifiable Suite for Native Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.26105/) (2026)
- [When to Think and When to Look: Uncertainty-Guided Lookback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15613/) (2025)
- [Self-Supervised Bootstrapping of Action-Predictive Embodied Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08167/) (2026)
- [Thinking With Tools, Not With Pixels: Tool Calls as Text Scaffolds for Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09682/) (2026)
- [VGI-Bench: Probing Visual Intelligence in Video Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19583/) (2026)
- [On the Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs for Simple Visual Planning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15460/) (2026)
- [Do multimodal models imagine electric sheep?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09693/) (2026)
- [StateSight: Benchmarking Latent Spatial-State Reconstruction in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.20414/) (2026)
- [Spatial Competence Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09594/) (2026)
- [UltraVR: A Diagnostic Ultra-Resolution Image-VQA Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05576/) (2026)
- [Bridging Modal Isolation in Interleaved Thinking: Supervising Modality Transitions via Stepwise Reinforcement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.12886/) (2026)
- [See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26769/) (2026)
- [Aphanta: Diagnosing Task-Aligned Image-Edited Intermediates for Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.26993/) (2026)
- [OCR-MetaReasoning Benchmark: Evaluating the Meta-Reasoning Ability of MLLMs in Text-Rich Image Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30678/) (2026)
- [Reasoning with Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16409/) (2026)
- [VisualCoding: Learning Executable Skills for Reliable Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14403/) (2026)
- [Plan-Bench: Can Existing VLMs Go Well Beyond Perception to Reason and Plan in Embodied Worlds?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18836/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose MIRA, a new benchmark designed to evaluate models in scenarios where generating intermediate visual images is essential for successful reasoning. Unlike traditional CoT methods that rely solely on text, tasks in MIRA require models to generate and utilize intermediate images - such as sketches, structural diagrams, or path drawings - to guide their reasoning process. This setup closely mirrors how humans solve complex problems through "drawing to think". To solve this, MIRA focuses on tasks that are intrinsically challenging and involve complex structures, spatial relationships, or reasoning steps that are difficult to express through language alone. To ensure that our evaluation data is of high-quality, we include 546 multimodal problems, annotated with intermediate visual images and final answers. We also propose a unified evaluation protocol for MIRA that spans three levels of evaluation input: direct input with image and question only, text-only CoT input with image and thinking prompts, and Visual-CoT input with both annotated image clues and textual thinking prompts. To probe the upper bound of model capacity on our benchmark, we also report pass@k and majority voting accuracies under different k settings. Experimental results show that existing multimodal large language models, including strongest private models as well as strong open-weight models, perform poorly when relying solely on textual prompts. However, when intermediate visual cues are provided, model performance improves consistently, yielding an average relative gain of 33.7% across all models and tasks. We also probe the upper bound by expanding the search space and designing textual prompts aligned with Visual-CoT, but both yield only limited improvements compared to our Visual-CoT setting. These results underscore the critical role of imagined visual information in enabling successful reasoning on MIRA.