# Locally-Supervised Global Image Restoration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01998 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01998/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Noise2Void - Learning Denoising from Single Noisy Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10980/) (2018)
- [Noise2Self: Blind Denoising by Self-Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.11365/) (2019)
- [Noisier2Noise: Learning to Denoise from Unpaired Noisy Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11908/) (2019)
- [A theoretical framework for self-supervised MR image reconstruction using sub-sampling via variable density Noisier2Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10278/) (2022)
- [Similarity and Quality Metrics for MR Image-To-Image Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.08431/) (2024)
- [A Comprehensive Review of U-Net and Its Variants: Advances and Applications in Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06895/) (2025)
- [Sparse2Inverse: Self-supervised inversion of sparse-view CT data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16921/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We address the problem of image reconstruction from incomplete measurements, encompassing both upsampling and inpainting, within a learning-based framework. Conventional supervised approaches require fully sampled ground truth data, while self-supervised methods allow incomplete ground truth but typically rely on random sampling that, in expectation, covers the entire image. In contrast, we consider fixed, deterministic sampling patterns with inherently incomplete coverage, even in expectation. To overcome this limitation, we exploit multiple invariances of the underlying image distribution, which theoretically allows us to achieve the same reconstruction performance as fully supervised approaches. We validate our method on optical-resolution image upsampling in photoacoustic microscopy (PAM), demonstrating competitive or superior results while requiring substantially less ground truth data.