# PRBench: A Standardized Probabilistic Robustness Benchmark

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01724 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01724/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 48 of its 74 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 48)

- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12877/) (2020)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08573/) (2019)
- [Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.01690/) (2020)
- [Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07204/) (2017)
- [The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.07528/) (2015)
- [RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09670/) (2020)
- [Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.01240/) (2015)
- [Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.02178/) (2019)
- [Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11569/) (2020)
- [Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03593/) (2020)
- [Adversarial Logit Pairing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06373/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01069/) (2018)
- [Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11914/) (2018)
- [Technical Report on the CleverHans v2.1.0 Adversarial Examples Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.00768/) (2016)
- [A Comprehensive Study on Robustness of Image Classification Models: Benchmarking and Rethinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14301/) (2023)
- [VC Classes are Adversarially Robustly Learnable, but Only Improperly](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04217/) (2019)
- [In Search of Robust Measures of Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11924/) (2020)
- [RobustART: Benchmarking Robustness on Architecture Design and Training Techniques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05211/) (2021)
- [DeepRobust: A PyTorch Library for Adversarial Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.06149/) (2020)
- [advertorch v0.1: An Adversarial Robustness Toolbox based on PyTorch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07623/) (2019)
- [A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07209/) (2018)
- [Adversarial Learning Guarantees for Linear Hypotheses and Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13617/) (2020)
- [Train simultaneously, generalize better: Stability of gradient-based minimax learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12561/) (2020)
- [A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09617/) (2021)
- [Probabilistically Robust Learning: Balancing Average- and Worst-case Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01136/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Non-Parametric Probabilistic Robustness: A Conservative Risk Estimator under Unknown Perturbation Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17380/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models are notoriously vulnerable to imperceptible perturbations. Most existing research centers on adversarial robustness (AR), which evaluates models under worst-case scenarios by examining the existence of deterministic adversarial examples (AEs). In contrast, probabilistic robustness (PR) adopts a statistical perspective, measuring the probability that predictions remain correct under stochastic perturbations. While PR is widely regarded as a practical complement to AR, dedicated training methods for improving PR are still relatively underexplored, albeit with emerging progress. Among the few PR-targeted training methods, we identify three limitations: i non-comparable evaluation protocols; ii limited comparisons to strong AT baselines despite anecdotal PR gains from AT; and iii no unified framework to compare the generalization of these methods. Thus, we introduce PRBench, the first benchmark dedicated to evaluating improvements in PR achieved by different robustness training methods. PRBench empirically compares most common AT and PR-targeted training methods using a comprehensive set of metrics, including clean accuracy, PR and AR performance, training efficiency, and generalization error (GE). We also provide theoretical analysis on the GE of PR performance across different training methods. Main findings revealed by PRBench include: AT methods are more versatile than PR-targeted training methods in terms of improving both AR and PR performance across diverse hyperparameter settings, while PR-targeted training methods consistently yield lower GE and higher clean accuracy. A leaderboard comprising 229 trained models across 7 datasets and 10 model architectures is publicly available at https://wellzline.github.io/PRBenchLeaderboard/.