# Quantum Deep Learning Still Needs a Quantum Leap

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01253 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01253/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 72 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Variational Quantum Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09265/) (2020)
- [Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.11173/) (2018)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04325/) (2022)
- [Quantum advantage in learning from experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00778/) (2021)
- [Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07059/) (2024)
- [Quantum-enhanced machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08251/) (2016)
- [A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.04271/) (2018)
- [Massive Exploration of Neural Machine Translation Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03906/) (2017)
- [q-means: A quantum algorithm for unsupervised machine learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03584/) (2018)
- [Towards provably efficient quantum algorithms for large-scale machine-learning models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03428/) (2023)
- [Quantum Perceptron Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04799/) (2016)
- [Quantum exploration algorithms for multi-armed bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.07049/) (2020)
- [Quantum linear systems algorithms: a primer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08227/) (2018)
- [Quantum algorithms for feedforward neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03089/) (2018)
- [A Review of Machine Learning Classification Using Quantum Annealing for Real-world Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02964/) (2021)
- [A quantum algorithm for training wide and deep classical neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.09200/) (2021)
- [Neutral Atom Quantum Computing Hardware: Performance and End-User Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14360/) (2023)
- [The Quantum Tortoise and the Classical Hare: A simple framework for understanding which problems quantum computing will accelerate (and which it will not)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15505/) (2023)
- [Quantum spectral method for gradient and Hessian estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03833/) (2024)
- [Quantum-Enhanced Weight Optimization for Neural Networks Using Grover's Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14568/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Theory and interpretability of Quantum Extreme Learning Machines: a Pauli-transfer matrix approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.18377/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum computing technology is advancing rapidly. Yet, even accounting for these trends, a quantum leap would be needed for quantum computers to meaningfully impact deep learning over the coming decade or two. We arrive at this conclusion based on a first-of-its-kind survey of quantum algorithms and how they match potential deep learning applications. This survey reveals three important areas where quantum computing could potentially accelerate deep learning, each of which faces a challenging roadblock to realizing its potential. First, quantum algorithms for matrix multiplication and other algorithms central to deep learning offer small theoretical improvements in the number of operations needed, but this advantage is overwhelmed on practical problem sizes by how slowly quantum computers do each operation. Second, some promising quantum algorithms depend on practical Quantum Random Access Memory (QRAM), which is underdeveloped. Finally, there are quantum algorithms that offer large theoretical advantages, but which are only applicable to special cases, limiting their practical benefits. In each of these areas, we support our arguments using quantitative forecasts of quantum advantage that build on the work by Choi et al. [2023] as well as new research on limitations and quantum hardware trends. Our analysis outlines the current scope of quantum deep learning and points to research directions that could lead to greater practical advances in the field.
