# Limits of Generalization in RLVR: Two Case Studies in Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27044 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.27044/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01939/) (2025)
- [The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22617/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20571/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14245/) (2025)
- [Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10947/) (2025)
- [Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16496/) (2025)
- [Competitive Programming with Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06807/) (2025)
- [The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14843/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Spurious Rewards Paradox: Mechanistically Understanding How RLVR Activates Memorization Shortcuts in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11061/) (2026)
- [CLIPO: Contrastive Learning in Policy Optimization Generalizes RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10101/) (2026)
- [Scaling Large Reasoning Models beyond Human Supervision: A Path toward Superintelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31075/) (2026)
- [GeoRA: Geometry-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation for RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09361/) (2026)
- [From Reasoning Chains to Verifiable Subproblems: Curriculum Reinforcement Learning Enables Credit Assignment for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.22074/) (2026)
- [QUBRIC: Co-Designing Queries and Rubrics for RL Beyond Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03968/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mathematical reasoning is a central challenge for large language models (LLMs), requiring not only correct answers but also faithful reasoning processes. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing such capabilities; however, its ability to foster genuine reasoning remains unclear. We investigate RLVR on two combinatorial problems with fully verifiable solutions: Activity Scheduling and the Longest Increasing Subsequence, using carefully curated datasets with unique optima. Across multiple reward designs, we find that RLVR improves evaluation metrics but often by reinforcing superficial heuristics rather than acquiring new reasoning strategies. These findings highlight the limits of RLVR generalization, emphasizing the importance of benchmarks that disentangle genuine mathematical reasoning from shortcut exploitation and provide faithful measures of progress. Code available at https://github.com/xashru/rlvr-seq-generalization.