# A General Incentives-Based Framework for Fairness in Multi-agent Resource Allocation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26740 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26740/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09635/) (2019)
- [Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.07773/) (2020)
- [Learning Fairness in Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.14472/) (2019)
- [Learning Fair Policies in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09421/) (2020)
- [Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming for On-Demand Ride-Pooling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08842/) (2019)
- [Data-Driven Methods for Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Ride-Pooling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.03524/) (2021)
- [Using Simple Incentives to Improve Two-Sided Fairness in Ridesharing Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14332/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the General Incentives-based Framework for Fairness (GIFF), a novel approach for fair multi-agent resource allocation that infers fair decision-making from standard value functions. In resource-constrained settings, agents optimizing for efficiency often create inequitable outcomes. Our approach leverages the action-value (Q-)function to balance efficiency and fairness without requiring additional training. Specifically, our method computes a local fairness gain for each action and introduces a counterfactual advantage correction term to discourage over-allocation to already well-off agents. This approach is formalized within a centralized control setting, where an arbitrator uses the GIFF-modified Q-values to solve an allocation problem. Empirical evaluations across diverse domains, including dynamic ridesharing, homelessness prevention, and a complex job allocation task-demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms strong baselines and can discover far-sighted, equitable policies. The framework's effectiveness is supported by a theoretical foundation; we prove its fairness surrogate is a principled lower bound on the true fairness improvement and that its trade-off parameter offers monotonic tuning. Our findings establish GIFF as a robust and principled framework for leveraging standard reinforcement learning components to achieve more equitable outcomes in complex multi-agent systems.