# Debate2Create: Robot Co-design via Multi-Agent LLM Debate

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25850 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25850/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 25 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [OpenAI Gym](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.01540/) (2016)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19118/) (2023)
- [Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05128/) (2023)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12931/) (2023)
- [Illuminating search spaces by mapping elites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.04909/) (2015)
- [Brax -- A Differentiable Physics Engine for Large Scale Rigid Body Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13281/) (2021)
- [AI safety via debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00899/) (2018)
- [Language to Rewards for Robotic Skill Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08647/) (2023)
- [Reward Design with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00001/) (2023)
- [Text2Reward: Reward Shaping with Language Models for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11489/) (2023)
- [DrEureka: Language Model Guided Sim-To-Real Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01967/) (2024)
- [The Perfect Blend: Redefining RLHF with Mixture of Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.20370/) (2024)
- [Scalable Co-Optimization of Morphology and Control in Embodied Machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06133/) (2017)
- [VLMgineer: Vision Language Models as Robotic Toolsmiths](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.12644/) (2025)
- [Text2Robot: Evolutionary Robot Design from Text Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19963/) (2024)
- [RoboMorph: Evolving Robot Morphology using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08626/) (2024)
- [RoboMoRe: LLM-based Robot Co-design via Joint Optimization of Morphology and Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00276/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Debate2Create (D2C), a multi-agent LLM framework that formulates robot co-design as structured, iterative debate grounded in physics-based evaluation. A design agent and control agent engage in a thesis-antithesis-synthesis loop, while criterion-specific LLM judges provide multi-objective feedback to steer exploration. Across five MuJoCo locomotion benchmarks, D2C achieves the highest default-normalized score among the evaluated LLM-based and black-box baselines, with gains up to 3.2x on Ant and nearly 9x on Swimmer. Iterative debate yields 18-35% gains over compute-matched zero-shot generation, and D2C-generated rewards transfer to default morphologies in 4/5 tasks. These results suggest that structured, simulator-grounded multi-agent interaction is a useful mechanism for joint morphology-reward optimization under a fixed-topology, per-candidate-RL protocol. Project page: debate2create.github.io.