# Implicature in Interaction: Understanding Implicature Improves Alignment in Human-LLM Interaction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25426 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25426/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13702/) (2023)
- [Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01247/) (2021)
- [The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06941/) (2025)
- [The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00059/) (2023)
- [Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16960/) (2023)
- [PUB: A Pragmatics Understanding Benchmark for Assessing LLMs' Pragmatics Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07078/) (2024)
- [The Goldilocks of Pragmatic Understanding: Fine-Tuning Strategy Matters for Implicature Resolution by LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14986/) (2022)
- [Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13775/) (2025)
- [Position: Stop Anthropomorphizing Intermediate Tokens as Reasoning/Thinking Traces!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09762/) (2025)
- [Does GPT-4 surpass human performance in linguistic pragmatics?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09545/) (2023)
- [Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12557/) (2025)
- [Do Large Language Models Understand Conversational Implicature -- A case study with a chinese sitcom](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19509/) (2024)
- [Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04101/) (2024)
- [Conversational implicatures in English dialogue: Annotated dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10704/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models and Emergence: A Complex Systems Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11135/) (2025)
- [Pragmatic inference of scalar implicature by LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06673/) (2024)
- [NomicLaw: Emergent Trust and Strategic Argumentation in LLMs During Collaborative Law-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05344/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) is positioning language at the core of human-computer interaction (HCI). We argue that advancing HCI requires attention to the linguistic foundations of interaction, particularly implicature (meaning conveyed beyond explicit statements through shared context) which is essential for human-AI (HAI) alignment. This study examines LLMs' ability to infer user intent embedded in context-driven prompts and whether understanding implicature improves response generation. Results show that larger models approximate human interpretations more closely, while smaller models struggle with implicature inference. Furthermore, implicature-based prompts significantly enhance the perceived relevance and quality of responses across models, with notable gains in smaller models. Overall, 67.6% of participants preferred responses with implicature-embedded prompts to literal ones, highlighting a clear preference for contextually nuanced communication. Our work contributes to understanding how linguistic theory can be used to address the alignment problem by making HAI interaction more natural and contextually grounded.