# SecureLearn -- An Attack-agnostic Defense for Multiclass Machine Learning Against Data Poisoning Attacks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22274 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22274/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Backdoor and data poisoning attacks](https://mlsanity.com/safety/backdoor-and-data-poisoning-attacks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00308/) (2018)
- [Detecting AI Trojans Using Meta Neural Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03137/) (2019)
- [Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08689/) (2017)
- [Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Medical Image Analysis Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10456/) (2019)
- [Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00741/) (2018)
- [Sever: A Robust Meta-Algorithm for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02815/) (2018)
- [MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.00225/) (2020)
- [Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.04495/) (2020)
- [Universal Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.11304/) (2018)
- [Label Sanitization against Label Flipping Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.00992/) (2018)
- [Subpopulation Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14026/) (2020)
- [Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04716/) (2021)
- [De-Pois: An Attack-Agnostic Defense against Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.03592/) (2021)
- [Model Inversion Attacks against Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07807/) (2022)
- [Exploring the Limits of Model-Targeted Indiscriminate Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03592/) (2023)
- [Label Flipping Data Poisoning Attack Against Wearable Human Activity Recognition System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.08433/) (2022)
- [DeepPoison: Feature Transfer Based Stealthy Poisoning Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02562/) (2021)
- [Hyperparameter Learning under Data Poisoning: Analysis of the Influence of Regularization via Multiobjective Bilevel Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01613/) (2023)
- [Advancing Security in AI Systems: A Novel Approach to Detecting Backdoors in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08208/) (2024)
- [Outlier-Oriented Poisoning Attack: A Grey-box Approach to Disturb Decision Boundaries by Perturbing Outliers in Multiclass Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00519/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data poisoning attacks are a potential threat to machine learning (ML) models, aiming to manipulate training datasets to disrupt their performance. Existing defenses are mostly designed to mitigate specific poisoning attacks or are aligned with particular ML algorithms. Furthermore, most defenses are developed to secure deep neural networks or binary classifiers. However, traditional multiclass classifiers need attention to be secure from data poisoning attacks, as these models are significant in developing multi-modal applications. Therefore, this paper proposes SecureLearn, a two-layer attack-agnostic defense to defend multiclass models from poisoning attacks. It comprises two components of data sanitization and a new feature-oriented adversarial training. To ascertain the effectiveness of SecureLearn, we proposed a 3D evaluation matrix with three orthogonal dimensions: data poisoning attack, data sanitization and adversarial training. Benchmarking SecureLearn in a 3D matrix, a detailed analysis is conducted at different poisoning levels (10%-20%), particularly analysing accuracy, recall, F1-score, detection and correction rates, and false discovery rate. The experimentation is conducted for four ML algorithms, namely Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), trained with three public datasets, against three poisoning attacks and compared with two existing mitigations. Our results highlight that SecureLearn is effective against the provided attacks. SecureLearn has strengthened resilience and adversarial robustness of traditional multiclass models and neural networks, confirming its generalization beyond algorithm-specific defenses. It consistently maintained accuracy above 90%, recall and F1-score above 75%. For neural networks, SecureLearn achieved 97% recall and F1-score against all selected poisoning attacks.
