# AI-Mediated Communication Reshapes Social Structure in Opinion-Diverse Groups

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21984 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21984/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 73 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.11176/) (2022)
- [ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13995/) (2025)
- [A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.6078/) (2013)
- [Smart Reply: Automated Response Suggestion for Email](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04870/) (2016)
- [Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11010/) (2021)
- [A new sociology of humans and machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14410/) (2024)
- [Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00590/) (2020)
- [Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05756/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Group segregation or cohesion can emerge from micro-level communication, and AI-assisted messaging may shape this process. Here, we report a preregistered online experiment (N = 557 across 60 sessions) in which participants discussed controversial political topics over multiple rounds and could freely change groups. Some participants received real-time message suggestions from a large language model (LLM), either personalized to their stance (individual assistance) or incorporating their group members' perspectives (relational assistance). We find that small variations in AI-mediated communication cascade into macro-level differences in group composition. Participants with individual assistance send more messages and show greater stance-based clustering, whereas those with relational assistance use more receptive language and form more heterogeneous ties. Hybrid expressive processes-jointly produced by humans and AI-can reshape collective organization. The patterns of structural division and cohesion depend on how AI incorporates users' interaction context.
