# Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Data Visualization Understanding by Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21740 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21740/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Chart understanding and anomaly detection](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/chart-understanding-and-anomaly-detection/)
- Mechanistic interpretability / [Interpreting vision and multimodal models](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/interpreting-vision-and-multimodal-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.09818/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05525/) (2024)
- [Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17146/) (2024)
- [FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.07300/) (2017)
- [Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04709/) (2023)
- [ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05506/) (2025)
- [What Do VLMs NOTICE? A Mechanistic Interpretability Pipeline for Gaussian-Noise-free Text-Image Corruption and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16320/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Visual Language Models on Standardized Visualization Literacy Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16632/) (2025)
- [The in-context inductive biases of vision-language models differ across modalities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01530/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Using OCR Heads to Verbalize Image Semantics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18823/) (2026)
- [LegendBench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Legend Understanding with Counterfactual Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24172/) (2026)
- [Rotated, but How Far? Diagnosing and Improving Object-Rotation Reasoning in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05715/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data visualizations are vital components of many scientific articles and news stories. Current vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle on basic data visualization understanding tasks, but the causes of failure remain unclear. Are VLM failures attributable to limitations in how visual information in the data visualization is encoded, how information is transferred between the vision and language modules, or how information is processed within the language module? We developed FUGU, a suite of data visualization understanding tasks, to precisely characterize potential sources of difficulty (e.g., extracting the position of data points, distances between them, and other summary statistics). We used FUGU to investigate three widely used VLMs. To diagnose the sources of errors produced by these models, we used activation patching and linear probes to trace information flow through models across a variety of prompting strategies. We found that some models fail to generate the coordinates of individual data points correctly, and these initial errors often lead to erroneous final responses. When these models are provided with the correct coordinates, performance improves substantially. Moreover, even when the model generates an incorrect response, the correct coordinates can be successfully read out from the latent representations in the vision encoder, suggesting that the source of these errors lies in the vision-language handoff. We further found that while providing correct coordinates helps with tasks involving one or a small number of data points, it generally worsens performance for tasks that require extracting statistical relationships across many data points. Fine-tuning models on FUGU also fails to yield ceiling performance. These findings point to architectural constraints in current VLMs that might pose significant challenges for reliable data visualization understanding.