# Large Language Models as Model Organisms for Human Associative Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21408 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21408/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 54 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14913/) (2020)
- [Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12409/) (2021)
- [In-context Learning and Induction Heads](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11895/) (2022)
- [An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02080/) (2021)
- [Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07677/) (2022)
- [What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01066/) (2022)
- [What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15661/) (2022)
- [Why Can GPT Learn In-Context? Language Models Implicitly Perform Gradient Descent as Meta-Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10559/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05110/) (2022)
- [Competition Dynamics Shape Algorithmic Phases of In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01003/) (2024)
- [ICLR: In-Context Learning of Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00070/) (2024)
- [Linking In-context Learning in Transformers to Human Episodic Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14992/) (2024)
- [Do LLMs dream of elephants (when told not to)? Latent concept association and associative memory in transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18400/) (2024)
- [In-Context Exemplars as Clues to Retrieving from Large Associative Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03498/) (2023)
- [Decoding In-Context Learning: Neuroscience-inspired Analysis of Representations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00313/) (2023)
- [Associative memory inspires improvements for in-context learning using a novel attention residual stream architecture](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15113/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Temporal Context Reinstatement Drives Episodic-Like Order Memory in Long-Context Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.22575/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Associative learning--forming links between co-occurring items--is fundamental to human cognition, reshaping internal representations in complex ways. Testing hypotheses on how representational changes occur in biological systems is challenging, but large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable alternative. Building on LLMs' in-context learning, we adapt a cognitive neuroscience associative learning paradigm and investigate how representations evolve across six models. Our initial findings reveal a non-monotonic pattern consistent with the Non-Monotonic Plasticity Hypothesis, with moderately similar items differentiating after learning. Leveraging the controllability of LLMs, we further show that this differentiation is modulated by the overlap of associated items with the broader vocabulary--a factor we term vocabulary interference, capturing how new associations compete with prior knowledge. We find that higher vocabulary interference amplifies differentiation, suggesting that representational change is influenced by both item similarity and global competition. Our findings position LLMs not only as powerful tools for studying representational dynamics in human-like learning systems, but also as accessible and general computational models for generating new hypotheses about the principles underlying memory reorganization in the brain.