# RAGRank: Using PageRank to Counter Poisoning in CTI LLM Pipelines

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20768 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20768/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 17 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [Privacy and security of RAG](https://mlsanity.com/rag/privacy-and-security-of-rag/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16130/) (2024)
- [AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12784/) (2024)
- [Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01558/) (2023)
- [PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07867/) (2024)
- [Certifiably Robust RAG against Retrieval Corruption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15556/) (2024)
- [CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07599/) (2024)
- [TrustRAG: Enhancing Robustness and Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00879/) (2025)
- [ConfusedPilot: Confused Deputy Risks in RAG-based LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04870/) (2024)
- [LLMCloudHunter: Harnessing LLMs for Automated Extraction of Detection Rules from Cloud-Based CTI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05194/) (2024)
- [Towards More Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Evaluating RAG Under Adversarial Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16708/) (2024)
- [Advancing TTP Analysis: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00280/) (2023)
- [Advancing Autonomous Incident Response: Leveraging LLMs and Cyber Threat Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10677/) (2025)
- [Towards Effective Identification of Attack Techniques in Cyber Threat Intelligence Reports using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03147/) (2025)
- [False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06252/) (2025)
- [ClaimTrust: Propagation Trust Scoring for RAG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10702/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as the dominant architectural pattern to operationalize Large Language Model (LLM) usage in Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) systems. However, this design is susceptible to poisoning attacks, and previously proposed defenses can fail for CTI contexts as cyber threat information is often completely new for emerging attacks, and sophisticated threat actors can mimic legitimate formats, terminology, and stylistic conventions. To address this issue, we propose that the robustness of modern RAG defenses can be accelerated by applying source credibility algorithms on corpora, using PageRank as an example. In our experiments, we demonstrate quantitatively that our algorithm applies a lower authority score to malicious documents while promoting trusted content, using the standardized MS MARCO dataset. We also demonstrate proof-of-concept performance of our algorithm on CTI documents and feeds.