# Why Did Apple Fall: Evaluating Curiosity in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20635 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20635/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15134/) (2025)
- [The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03730/) (2025)
- [Navigate the Unknown: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Intrinsic Motivation Guided Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17621/) (2025)
- [Ask to Learn: A Study on Curiosity-driven Question Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03350/) (2019)
- ["What makes a question inquisitive?" A Study on Type-Controlled Inquisitive Question Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.08056/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Curiosity serves as a pivotal conduit for human beings to discover and learn new knowledge. Recent advancements of large language models (LLMs) in natural language processing have sparked discussions regarding whether these models possess capability of curiosity-driven learning akin to humans. In this paper, starting from the human curiosity assessment questionnaire Five-Dimensional Curiosity scale Revised (5DCR), we design a comprehensive evaluation framework that covers dimensions such as Information Seeking, Thrill Seeking, and Social Curiosity to assess the extent of curiosity exhibited by LLMs. The results demonstrate that LLMs exhibit a stronger thirst for knowledge than humans but still tend to make conservative choices when faced with uncertain environments. We further investigated the relationship between curiosity and thinking of LLMs, confirming that curious behaviors can enhance the model's reasoning and active learning abilities. These findings suggest that LLMs have the potential to exhibit curiosity similar to that of humans, providing experimental support for the future development of learning capabilities and innovative research in LLMs.