# Every Question Has Its Own Value: Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Human Values

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20187 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20187/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL training of language and agent models](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-training-of-language-and-agent-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00177/) (2019)
- [C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08322/) (2023)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08967/) (2024)
- [Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23829/) (2025)
- [General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14652/) (2025)
- [Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16806/) (2025)
- [One Token to Fool LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08794/) (2025)
- [Importance Weighted Transfer of Samples in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.10886/) (2018)
- [ConfClip: Confidence-Weighted and Clipped Reward for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17730/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Beyond Accuracy: Unveiling Inefficiency Patterns in Tool-Integrated Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05404/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose Reinforcement Learning with Explicit Human Values (RLEV), a method that aligns Large Language Model (LLM) optimization directly with quantifiable human value signals. While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) effectively trains models in objective domains using binary correctness rewards, it overlooks that not all tasks are equally significant. RLEV extends this framework by incorporating human-defined value signals directly into the reward function. Using exam-style data with explicit ground-truth value labels, RLEV consistently outperforms correctness-only baselines across multiple RL algorithms and model scales. Crucially, RLEV policies not only improve value-weighted accuracy but also learn a value-sensitive termination policy: concise for low-value prompts, thorough for high-value ones. We demonstrate this behavior stems from value-weighted gradient amplification on end-of-sequence tokens. Ablation studies confirm the gain is causally linked to value alignment. RLEV remains robust under noisy value signals, such as difficulty-based labels, demonstrating that optimizing for an explicit utility function offers a practical path to aligning LLMs with human priorities.