# Beyond Reactivity: Measuring Proactive Problem Solving in LLM Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19771 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19771/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [GPT-4V(ision) is a Generalist Web Agent, if Grounded](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01614/) (2024)
- [Agent S: An Open Agentic Framework that Uses Computers Like a Human](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08164/) (2024)
- [MDAgents: An Adaptive Collaboration of LLMs for Medical Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15155/) (2024)
- [WebPilot: A Versatile and Autonomous Multi-Agent System for Web Task Execution with Strategic Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15978/) (2024)
- [ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11339/) (2023)
- [Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12361/) (2024)
- [Synthetic Data Generation Using Large Language Models: Advances in Text and Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14023/) (2025)
- [Ask-before-Plan: Proactive Language Agents for Real-World Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12639/) (2024)
- [ContextAgent: Context-Aware Proactive LLM Agents with Open-World Sensory Perceptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14668/) (2025)
- [Creating General User Models from Computer Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10831/) (2025)
- [VisionTasker: Mobile Task Automation Using Vision Based UI Understanding and LLM Task Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11190/) (2023)
- [ProactiveVideoQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluating Proactive Interactions in Video Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09313/) (2025)
- [The Looming Threat of Fake and LLM-generated LinkedIn Profiles: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection and Prevention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11864/) (2023)
- [ProactiveVA: Proactive Visual Analytics with LLM-Based UI Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18165/) (2025)
- [ProCIS: A Benchmark for Proactive Retrieval in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06460/) (2024)
- [SPARTA ALIGNMENT: Collectively Aligning Multiple Language Models through Combat](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04721/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Dive into Claude Code: The Design Space of Today's and Future AI Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.14228/) (2026)
- [ProactBench: Beyond What The User Asked For](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09228/) (2026)
- [Agentic Coding Needs Proactivity, Not Just Autonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06717/) (2026)
- [Knowing Isn't Understanding: Re-grounding Generative Proactivity with Epistemic and Behavioral Insight](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15259/) (2026)
- [Proactive Service Agents: A Unified Decision Framework, Methods, and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03727/) (2026)
- [TIDE: Proactive Multi-Problem Discovery via Template-Guided Iteration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.04743/) (2026)
- [Agents in the Large: Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30478/) (2026)
- [Just A Rather Very Intelligent Spoken Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16610/) (2026)
- [Foundations of Proactive Agents: Principles, Technical Layers, and Proactivity-Gym](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37267/) (2026)
- [Jarvis: A Proactive Speech Agent for Multi-Party Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07506/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents are increasingly moving towards proactivity: rather than awaiting instruction, they exercise agency to anticipate user needs and solve them autonomously. However, evaluating proactivity is challenging; current benchmarks are constrained to localized context, limiting their ability to test reasoning across sources and longer time horizons. To address this gap, we present PROBE (Proactive Resolution Of BottlEnecks). PROBE decomposes proactivity as a pipeline of three core capabilities: (1) searching for unspecified issues, (2) identifying specific bottlenecks, and (3) executing appropriate resolutions. We apply PROBE to evaluate leading LLMs and popular agentic frameworks, showing that even state-of-the-art models struggle to solve this benchmark. Computing our consistent measurements across frontier LLMs and agents, we find that the best end-to-end performance of 40% is achieved by both GPT-5 and Claude Opus-4.1. Additionally, we demonstrate the relative capabilities of each model and analyze mutual failure modes. Our results highlight the current limitations of autonomous action in agentic systems, and expose promising future research directions.