# Chain-of-Conceptual-Thought Elicits Daily Conversation in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18434 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18434/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04091/) (2023)
- [Large Concept Models: Language Modeling in a Sentence Representation Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08821/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Emotional Generation Capability of Large Language Models via Emotional Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06836/) (2024)
- [Steering Conversational Large Language Models for Long Emotional Support Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10453/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [MILO: Efficient Many-shot In-Context Learning with Block-wise Low-rank Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29913/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is widely applied to enhance the LLM capability in math, coding and reasoning tasks. However, its performance is limited for open-domain tasks, when there are no clearly defined reasoning steps or logical transitions. To mitigate such challenges, we propose a new prompt-based paradigm called Chain of Conceptual Thoughts (CoCT), which suggests the LLM first to produce the tag of concepts, then complete the detailed content following the concept. To encourage this hierarchical way of thinking, we implement the concepts with emotions, strategies and topics. We experiment with this paradigm in daily and emotional support conversations, covering tasks with both in-domain and out-of-domain concept settings. Automatic, human, and LLM-based evaluations reveal that CoCT surpasses several prompt-based baselines such as self-refine, ECoT, SoT and RAG, suggesting a potential solution of LLM prompting paradigm for a wider scope of tasks.
