# ToolCritic: Detecting and Correcting Tool-Use Errors in Dialogue Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17052 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17052/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Tool learning and function calling](https://mlsanity.com/agents/tool-learning-and-function-calling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [Towards Scalable Multi-domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.05855/) (2019)
- [ToolTalk: Evaluating Tool-Usage in a Conversational Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10775/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Retry, Switch, or Abstain? Learning Strategy-Aware Tool-Use Policies via Controlled Error Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.11977/) (2026)
- [Calibration is the Bottleneck: An Action-Class Diagnostic of Multi-Turn Tool-Calling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00949/) (2026)
- [No Action Without a NOD: A Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Architecture for Reliable Service Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12240/) (2026)
- [Towards Reliable AI Data Scientists: Data Agents with Workflow Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35255/) (2026)
- [When Tools Silently Lie: Evaluating and Mitigating Blind Compliance in Tool-Augmented Data Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37153/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in real-world applications, but tool usage errors still hinder their reliability. We introduce ToolCritic, a diagnostic framework that evaluates and improves LLM behavior in multi-turn, tool-augmented dialogues. ToolCritic detects eight distinct error types specific to tool-calling (e.g., premature invocation, argument misalignment, and misinterpretation of tool outputs) and provides targeted feedback to the main LLM. The main LLM, assumed to have strong reasoning, task understanding and orchestration capabilities, then revises its response based on ToolCritic's feedback. We systematically define these error categories and construct a synthetic dataset to train ToolCritic. Experimental results on the Schema-Guided Dialogue (SGD) dataset demonstrate that ToolCritic improves tool-calling accuracy by up to 13% over baselines, including zero-shot prompting and self-correction techniques. This represents a promising step toward more robust LLM integration with external tools in real-world dialogue applications.