# An Agentic Framework with LLMs for Solving Complex Vehicle Routing Problems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16701 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16701/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 37 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05128/) (2023)
- [Pointer Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03134/) (2015)
- [Large Language Models as Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03409/) (2023)
- [Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08475/) (2018)
- [Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09940/) (2016)
- [POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.16011/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09561/) (2022)
- [ReEvo: Large Language Models as Hyper-Heuristics with Reflective Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01145/) (2024)
- [Evolution of Heuristics: Towards Efficient Automatic Algorithm Design Using Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02051/) (2024)
- [DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08224/) (2023)
- [Learning Improvement Heuristics for Solving Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.05784/) (2019)
- [Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Heavy Decoder: Toward Large Scale Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07985/) (2023)
- [Hybrid Genetic Search for the CVRP: Open-Source Implementation and SWAP* Neighborhood](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10384/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models as Evolutionary Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19046/) (2023)
- [Learning to Delegate for Large-scale Vehicle Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.04139/) (2021)
- [Monte Carlo Tree Search for Comprehensive Exploration in LLM-Based Automatic Heuristic Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08603/) (2025)
- [Learning the Travelling Salesperson Problem Requires Rethinking Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07054/) (2020)
- [BQ-NCO: Bisimulation Quotienting for Efficient Neural Combinatorial Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.03313/) (2023)
- [Learning to Search Feasible and Infeasible Regions of Routing Problems with Flexible Neural k-Opt](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18264/) (2023)
- [HSEvo: Elevating Automatic Heuristic Design with Diversity-Driven Harmony Search and Genetic Algorithm Using LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14995/) (2024)
- [RL4CO: an Extensive Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17100/) (2023)
- [MVMoE: Multi-Task Vehicle Routing Solver with Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01029/) (2024)
- [Towards Omni-generalizable Neural Methods for Vehicle Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.19587/) (2023)
- [Towards Generalizable Neural Solvers for Vehicle Routing Problems via Ensemble with Transferrable Local Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14104/) (2023)
- [RouteFinder: Towards Foundation Models for Vehicle Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15007/) (2024)
- [PyVRP: a high-performance VRP solver package](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13795/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Automated Large-scale CVRP Solver Design via LLM-assisted Flexible MCTS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.03339/) (2026)
- [Reinforcement Learning Enhanced LLM Agents for Complex Vehicle Routing Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00859/) (2026)
- [From Topology to Trajectory: LLM-Driven World Models For Supply Chain Resilience](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11041/) (2026)
- [Sim2Schedule: A Simulator-Guided LLM Framework for Autonomous Open-Pit Mine Scheduling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10286/) (2026)
- [SimpleEvol: An Agent-Loop Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Heuristic Design with Minimal Human Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37172/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Complex vehicle routing problems (VRPs) remain a fundamental challenge, demanding substantial expert effort for intent interpretation and algorithm design. While large language models (LLMs) offer a promising path toward automation, current approaches still rely on external intervention, which restrict autonomy and often lead to execution errors and low solution feasibility. To address these challenges, we propose an Agentic Framework with LLMs (AFL) for solving complex vehicle routing problems, achieving full automation from problem instance to solution. AFL directly extracts knowledge from raw inputs and enables self-contained code generation without handcrafted modules or external solvers. To improve trustworthiness, AFL decomposes the overall pipeline into three manageable subtasks and employs four specialized agents whose coordinated interactions enforce cross-functional consistency and logical soundness. Extensive experiments on 60 complex VRPs, ranging from standard benchmarks to practical variants, validate the effectiveness and generality of our framework, showing comparable performance against meticulously designed algorithms. Notably, it substantially outperforms existing LLM-based baselines in both code reliability and solution feasibility, achieving rates close to 100% on the evaluated benchmarks.