# Blending Learning to Rank and Dense Representations for Efficient and Effective Cascades

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16393 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16393/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08734/) (2017)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08663/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09118/) (2021)
- [ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12832/) (2020)
- [Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.00808/) (2020)
- [Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07820/) (2020)
- [Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06967/) (2021)
- [Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.14424/) (2019)
- [Overview of the TREC 2020 deep learning track](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07662/) (2021)
- [Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negatives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08051/) (2021)
- [COIL: Revisit Exact Lexical Match in Information Retrieval with Contextualized Inverted List](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07186/) (2021)
- [Pseudo-Relevance Feedback for Multiple Representation Dense Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11251/) (2021)
- [A Thorough Comparison of Cross-Encoders and LLMs for Reranking SPLADE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10407/) (2024)
- [Overview of the TREC 2021 deep learning track](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08191/) (2025)
- [Match Your Words! A Study of Lexical Matching in Neural Information Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.05662/) (2021)
- [Efficient and Effective Tree-based and Neural Learning to Rank](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08680/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the exploitation of both lexical and neural relevance signals for ad-hoc passage retrieval. Our exploration involves a large-scale training dataset in which dense neural representations of MS-MARCO queries and passages are complemented and integrated with 253 hand-crafted lexical features extracted from the same corpus. Blending of the relevance signals from the two different groups of features is learned by a classical Learning-to-Rank (LTR) model based on a forest of decision trees. To evaluate our solution, we employ a pipelined architecture where a dense neural retriever serves as the first stage and performs a nearest-neighbor search over the neural representations of the documents. Our LTR model acts instead as the second stage that re-ranks the set of candidates retrieved by the first stage to enhance effectiveness. The results of reproducible experiments conducted with state-of-the-art dense retrievers on publicly available resources show that the proposed solution significantly enhances the end-to-end ranking performance while relatively minimally impacting efficiency. Specifically, we achieve a boost in nDCG@10 of up to 11% with an increase in average query latency of only 4.3%. This confirms the advantage of seamlessly combining two distinct families of signals that mutually contribute to retrieval effectiveness.
