# Cost Savings from Automatic Quality Assessment of Generated Images

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16179 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16179/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 39 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05543/) (2023)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Improved Techniques for Training GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03498/) (2016)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.10789/) (2022)
- [Demystifying MMD GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01401/) (2018)
- [ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05977/) (2023)
- [Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02905/) (2024)
- [Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01569/) (2023)
- [Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09341/) (2023)
- [Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17090/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01291/) (2024)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14420/) (2023)
- [Fast High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Adversarial Diffusion Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12015/) (2024)
- [VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15252/) (2024)
- [Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18235/) (2023)
- [Q-Instruct: Improving Low-level Visual Abilities for Multi-modality Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06783/) (2023)
- [What You See is What You Read? Improving Text-Image Alignment Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10400/) (2023)
- [Learning Multi-dimensional Human Preference for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14705/) (2024)
- [Transformer for Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01097/) (2020)
- [AesBench: An Expert Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models on Image Aesthetics Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08276/) (2024)
- [Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Rich Attributes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16754/) (2022)
- [Perceptual Image Quality Assessment with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14730/) (2021)
- [Towards Artistic Image Aesthetics Assessment: a Large-scale Dataset and a New Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15166/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep generative models have shown impressive progress in recent years, making it possible to produce high quality images with a simple text prompt or a reference image. However, state of the art technology does not yet meet the quality standards offered by traditional photographic methods. For this reason, production pipelines that use generated images often include a manual stage of image quality assessment (IQA). This process is slow and expensive, especially because of the low yield of automatically generated images that pass the quality bar. The IQA workload can be reduced by introducing an automatic pre-filtering stage, that will increase the overall quality of the images sent to review and, therefore, reduce the average cost required to obtain a high quality image. We present a formula that estimates the cost savings depending on the precision and pass yield of a generic IQA engine. This formula is applied in a use case of background inpainting, showcasing a significant cost saving of 51.61% obtained with a simple AutoML solution.