# AURA: An Agent Autonomy Risk Assessment Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15739 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15739/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 10 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09187/) (2024)
- [AgentAuditor: Human-Level Safety and Security Evaluation for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00641/) (2025)
- [Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03671/) (2025)
- [Evaluating language models as risk scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14614/) (2024)
- [LLM-based relevance assessment still can't replace human relevance assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17156/) (2024)
- [Balancing Autonomy and Alignment: A Multi-Dimensional Taxonomy for Autonomous LLM-powered Multi-Agent Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03659/) (2023)
- [Position: The Real Barrier to LLM Agent Usability is Agentic ROI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17767/) (2025)
- [Potential and Limitations of LLMs in Capturing Structured Semantics: A Case Study on SRL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06410/) (2024)
- [Risks, Causes, and Mitigations of Widespread Deployments of Large Language Models (LLMs): A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04643/) (2024)
- [Human-AI Governance (HAIG): A Trust-Utility Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.01651/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Implicit Intelligence -- Evaluating Agents on What Users Don't Say](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20424/) (2026)
- [KYA: A Framework-Agnostic Trust Layer for Autonomous Systems with Verifiable Provenance and Hierarchical Policy Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25376/) (2026)
- [Agentic AI Autonomy Assessment: A Decision-Support Framework Towards Governed Supply Chain Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.25405/) (2026)
- [AgentStripes: An Evidence-Graded Maturity Model for AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18603/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As autonomous agentic AI systems see increasing adoption across organisations, persistent challenges in alignment, governance, and risk management threaten to impede deployment at scale. We present AURA (Agent aUtonomy Risk Assessment), a unified framework designed to detect, quantify, and mitigate risks arising from agentic AI. Building on recent research and practical deployments, AURA introduces a gamma-based risk scoring methodology that balances risk assessment accuracy with computational efficiency and practical considerations. AURA provides an interactive process to score, evaluate and mitigate the risks of running one or multiple AI Agents, synchronously or asynchronously (autonomously). The framework is engineered for Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) oversight and presents Agent-to-Human (A2H) communication mechanisms, allowing for seamless integration with agentic systems for autonomous self-assessment, rendering it interoperable with established protocols (MCP and A2A) and tools. AURA supports a responsible and transparent adoption of agentic AI and provides robust risk detection and mitigation while balancing computational resources, positioning it as a critical enabler for large-scale, governable agentic AI in enterprise environments.