# AudioEval: Automatic Dual-Perspective and Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Text-to-Audio-Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14570 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14570/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [AQAScore: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in Text-to-Audio Generation via Audio Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14728/) (2026)
- [CMI-RewardBench: Evaluating Music Reward Models with Compositional Multimodal Instruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00610/) (2026)
- [Improving Text-to-Audio Instruction Following via Fine-Grained Feedback from Audio-Aware Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.13408/) (2026)
- [TTM-Bench: A Framework for Text-to-Music System Performance Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18585/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-audio (TTA) generation is advancing rapidly, but evaluation remains challenging because human listening studies are expensive and existing automatic metrics capture only limited aspects of perceptual quality. We introduce AudioEval, a large-scale TTA evaluation dataset with 4,200 generated audio samples (11.7 hours) from 24 systems and 126,000 ratings collected from both experts and non-experts across five dimensions: enjoyment, usefulness, complexity, quality, and text alignment. Using AudioEval, we benchmark diverse automatic evaluators to compare perspective- and dimension-level differences across model families. We also propose Qwen-DisQA as a strong reference baseline: it jointly processes prompts and generated audio to predict multi-dimensional ratings for both annotator groups, modeling rater disagreement via distributional prediction and achieving strong performance. We will release AudioEval to support future research in TTA evaluation.