# Scaling Test-Time Compute to Achieve IOI Gold Medal with Open-Weight Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14232 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14232/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21787/) (2024)
- [Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15240/) (2024)
- [From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17419/) (2025)
- [Inference Scaling Laws: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal Inference for Problem-Solving with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00724/) (2024)
- [Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07791/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24235/) (2025)
- [Deep Think with Confidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15260/) (2025)
- [RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02387/) (2025)
- [Generative Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12832/) (2024)
- [Competitive Programming with Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06807/) (2025)
- [ALGO: Synthesizing Algorithmic Programs with LLM-Generated Oracle Verifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14591/) (2023)
- [PairJudge RM: Perform Best-of-N Sampling with Knockout Tournament](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13007/) (2025)
- [GenSelect: A Generative Approach to Best-of-N](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17797/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20802/) (2026)
- [ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.23681/) (2026)
- [Exploring Pass-Rate Reward in Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02944/) (2026)
- [RefineRL: Advancing Competitive Programming with Self-Refinement Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00790/) (2026)
- [Perfect score on IPhO 2025 theory by Gemini agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03352/) (2026)
- [Majority Voting for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.15618/) (2026)
- [Post-Training Language Models for Gold-Medal Performance in Coding Competitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.02849/) (2026)
- [Entropy-Regularized Rank-Masked Policy Optimization for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.09135/) (2026)
- [Humanize Olympiad Agents: A Multi-Session Workflow for Olympiad Problem Solving with Solve, Review, Wiki, Verify](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.13632/) (2026)
- [Beyond the Verdict: Agentic Code Judging with Verifiable Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18760/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Competitive programming has become a rigorous benchmark for evaluating the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) stands out as one of the most prestigious annual competitions in competitive programming and has become a key benchmark for comparing human and AI-level programming ability. While several proprietary models have been claimed to achieve gold medal-level performance at the IOI, often with undisclosed methods, achieving comparable results with open-weight models remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we present GenCluster, a scalable and reproducible test-time compute framework that attains IOI gold-level performance using open-weight models. It combines large-scale generation, behavioral clustering, ranking, and a round-robin submission strategy to efficiently explore diverse solution spaces under limited validation budgets. Our experiments show that the performance of our proposed approach scales consistently with available compute, narrowing the gap between open and closed systems. Notably, we will show that GenCluster can achieve a gold medal at IOI 2025 for the first time with an open-weight model gpt-oss-120b, setting a new benchmark for transparent and reproducible evaluation of reasoning in LLMs
