# Readability ne Learnability: Rethinking the Role of Simplicity in Training Small Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13915 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13915/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00159/) (2024)
- [TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07759/) (2023)
- [Talking About Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03551/) (2022)
- [Evaluating n-Gram Novelty of Language Models Using Rusty-DAWG](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13069/) (2024)
- [Thinking beyond the anthropomorphic paradigm benefits LLM research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09192/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies suggest that very small language models (SLMs) can generate surprisingly coherent text when trained on simplified, child-directed corpora such as TinyStories. These findings have been interpreted as evidence that readability -- characterized by accessible vocabulary, familiar narrative structure, and simple syntax -- plays a key role in enabling such capabilities to emerge. In this paper, we challenge that interpretation. We construct synthetic datasets with matched structure but varied readability, and find that readability alone does not predict coherence or learning efficiency in SLMs. Models trained on complex, adult-level text perform comparably to those trained on simplified language, and even exhibit faster development of coherence during training. Instead, we show that statistical simplicity, as measured by n-gram diversity, is a stronger predictor of learnability. Our findings caution against the growing trend of anthropomorphizing language model training -- drawing parallels to human cognitive development without empirical basis -- and argue for more precise reasoning about what properties actually support capability emergence in small models.