# Grounding Long-Context Reasoning with Contextual Normalization for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13191 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13191/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)
- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG pipeline design and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-pipeline-design-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06654/) (2024)
- [LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15204/) (2024)
- [ALR2: A Retrieve-then-Reason Framework for Long-context Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03227/) (2024)
- [Towards AI Search Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17188/) (2025)
- [Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07773/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [RENDER: Controlling Reader-Facing Evidence in LLM Memory Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23568/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become an essential approach for extending the reasoning and knowledge capacity of large language models (LLMs). While prior research has primarily focused on retrieval quality and prompting strategies, the influence of how the retrieved documents are framed, i.e., context format, remains underexplored. We show that seemingly superficial choices, such as delimiters or structural markers in key-value extraction, can induce substantial shifts in accuracy and stability, even when semantic content is identical. To systematically investigate this effect, we design controlled experiments that vary context density, delimiter styles, and positional placement, revealing the underlying factors that govern performance differences. Building on these insights, we introduce Contextual Normalization, a lightweight strategy that adaptively standardizes context representations before generation. Extensive experiments on both controlled and real-world RAG benchmarks across diverse settings demonstrate that the proposed strategy consistently improves robustness to order variation and strengthens long-context utilization. These findings underscore that reliable RAG depends not only on retrieving the right content, but also on how that content is presented, offering both new empirical evidence and a practical technique for better long-context reasoning.